Porn Performers may Have Licensing In Their Future

 

I got a tip today that a certain HIV assoiciated group is about to make a push on California Governor Jerry Brown to call for a special legislative session to implement a “total legislative package” to regulate the adult film industry.

This would include testing, mandating condoms and the licensing of adult performers, similar to how Nevada licenses prostitutes.

Now I can hear the FSC now screaming that’s a restraint on free speech…yada yada but they best be VERY careful how they frame that argument because it has been tried in the past and it almost always fails.  Right here in Atlanta, for instance, strippers have to have a license from the county to strip, the courts flatly rejected the free speech issue.  Advocates for the permits will say that it is no more a free speech issue than filming permits are.

Now I kinda doubt that Jerry Brown is going to call this special session but if you think that is the main goal of  the push you’d be….well an idiot, the goal is to raise awareness and drum up support for it for when the legislature does come back in session, and this time I expect it will take more than buying off Mike Gatto to squash it.

Don’t say I didn’t warn ya…..

 

87390cookie-checkPorn Performers may Have Licensing In Their Future

Porn Performers may Have Licensing In Their Future

Share This

210 Responses

  1. In many places all over state California they make massage therapist strippers go get license. That makes them get finger print at local police deparment that has them test for STD deases at health deparment is required none negotiable buy state. If your caught with out your licence if your stripper or massage therapist your in big trouble.

  2. As long as the license isn’t used as a way to regulate content – the free expression of talent – there’s no reason California could not require porn talent to be licensed.

    If you think of mainstream, you cannot write for, produce, direct or act in a theatrical, television or film production if you’re not a union member; you cannot distribute content via television or radio without an FCC license; you can’t run a newspaper without a business license. And, hey, states are putting in any number of regulations as to who can and cannot vote – the purest act of democracy and self-expression. Take it one step further, you have to get a permit to sponsor a parade and the Supreme Court has ruled that a parade is a form of protected free speech.

    The government could even use porn’s argument about talent as an argument to require licensing. States, counties and cities license businesses. Porn argues that talent are not employees; they are independent contractors agreeing to provide their services. If they are independent businesses, there’s no reason that they couldn’t require them to be licensed businesses.

    It just can’t use the license as a vehicle to dictate what can and can’t be filmed as content by the license holder.

  3. If SAG finds out that a SAG-AFTRA union member worked on a non-SAG film, they will kick your ass out of the union.
    And, there goes 90% of your possible work…

    So, who’s licensed?
    Doctors, plumbers, general contractors, CPA’s, Lawyers, electricians, boxers, nurses, psychologists, psychiatrists, exterminators, etc., etc., etc.

    But, if you go with the theory that the porn industry is nothing more than a marketing platform for prostitution or escorting then of course they would be opposed to getting licensed…
    Or, maybe because of some of the questionable/unethical/dangerous activities that take place where people are making decisions based purely on money and not their own well-being?

    What other reason could there be? No one wants to be regulated or follow rules, but there ARE ultimately some huge benefits that go along with being licensed and/or regulated.
    You know, like letting a qualified medical professional regulate the fact that sticking a bloody penis in someone’s mouth is probably not a really good idea…

  4. I dislike government regulation as much as the next guy, but taking two cocks up your ass and a mouth full of jizz shouldn’t be protected by free speech. License up, regulate it, move on.

  5. What Mike failing say becuase he does know that California all ready licenses stippers and massage therapist in same manner it does in Atlanta. So would be no suprise if this passed.

  6. The FSC and their defenders know all about the meaning of the word idiot…because they’re all a bunch of inept idiotic losers… Every time they open their mouths they insult the intelligence of most people on earth..

    I can’t wait until this “total legislative package” passes.
    The industry can fight all they want … They’re going to lose!
    Go Weinstein!

    @Diane Duke or the goon that reads this for her.
    Do you think you or Christian Mann can maybe hire some better bullies and trolls.
    I’m bored. It’s the same old …same old..
    They keep using the same recycled give away act..
    Maybe you can upgrade from 5th grade to 6th grade bullies?
    I’m willing to donate 25 cents to this important cause! just saying…
    Thanks for taking the time to read this and for taking this important advice into consideration.. *fingers crossed* … Diane or goon… 😉

  7. Licensing won’t happen…too many big $ folks would miss out with the performers (prostitutes) who would then be legal and not liable to prosecution and of course not needing to go suck ten dicks on film when they can legally make the same at a hotel with one dick

  8. It’s all power playing…the OPIM-STI will get negotiated and performers will be tested at agent/producer expense so they can keep their cut. So e will be condom only the barrier free will be spending big bucks on testing for the performers who start and stay disease free…condom films will be a genre like gay..and safe sex can be fun PSA …if they were smart 🙂

  9. The industry is just trying to push that day down the road…they know once Cal/OSHA adopts OPIM-STI it will be a fed standard, then other states will have a way to legalize escorting if not condo free adult films. That means coming out of the dark where they are making buckets of money right now…ita all about keeping the green coming in.

  10. @DWB

    Why not? What about the guy who lifts cars with his nose piercing? It’s like a train wreck to me…but no less a physical feat than fire walkers and stuff like that. It’s using ones body in creative expression. I think it’s amazing that people can fit two and three dicks in their asses…as in …don’t try this at home folks!

  11. Lots of magicians and stuntmen (remember Evil and his bikes that started motocross) make millions $$ but….must prove that no matter what danger they are personally willing to risk…they do not endanger others in pursuit of their creative expression

  12. @lacey

    Or having a medical opinion that the 50 penis’s shooting Into your anus are disease free?

  13. Here what like get stipper license in MIke home city of Atlanta. See price for license in Altanta how pay for program.

    It really depends on if you are in the City Limits of Atlanta or not, you would need to call Atlanta Police Permits Office at 404-853-4470 . Also permits are $350.00 and it is a two part process, you have to take a money order for 50.00 first for them to do a background check, on you and then if you pass that then you can go back the following day and you have to give them another money order for $300.00, It is not a one day process so don’t think that if you go up there you will get it within that same day, It takes two.
    Also if you have more than 2 misdemeanors within 5 years or a Felony within 7 years they will not allow you a permit, also if you have any drug charges, pending or past automatic No, and same with any Prostitution charges past or pending it is an automatic NO.

  14. So if your adult dancer in California your must have adult entertainer license issued by the police department. So would be no suprise if they did this with porn indusrty. As you can see Atlanta license do through back round check as well charge very hefty fee have one.

  15. There is no such thing as a “state-issued” strippers license. Regulation of these type of businesses is handled by the local jurisdictions (municipality or county). You will have to be more specific about WHERE it is you are interested in working and then check with the licensing authority of that particular municipality.

  16. I think there is a lot we still may not know yet. I think Black knows a lot lot that he isn’t informing people of. This is another thing that he said would be need to be.

    I presume that Mike is talking about the AHF.

    I’m still waiting for Jilted’s opinion on this one. Could this be tough to beat or just a minor speed bump? How will they check for licenses? Will producers or talent have to report now? If producers are just asked to check for licenses then what will be the incentive to actually do so?

  17. It IS going to pass Richard! You can count on it! Michael Weinstein will Never give up! no matter what the losers in the industry throw his way! That’s what makes him AWESOME!

  18. How much will the licenses cost? Who will have to pay for the license? This brings up a lot of questions. Like, if these cost money who will provide them with enough free DVD’s to pay the cost? Ladies, go to Mike Kulich if that is the case. He is your go to guy.

  19. The cost on stipper license falls on stripper who pay for it strip club does cover the cost of getting one. It again why many porn stars refuse work in San Diego California where there made have one work in there stip clubs there. Not say porn stars do vist there they just do go there alot for that reason unless retire from porn indusrty..

  20. @Cpan,
    Rob doesnt know shit. He is talking, and taking credit for shit he has had absolutely no hand in. Talk, like Rob, is cheap. The license will be very similar to the State Athletic Commision’s current boxer and MMA fighter license. (I first suggeted this on an industry board in 2007) Blacks claims that he is pushing these things forward in Sacremento, and with AHF is bulllshit. I have said all along, Black is right on alot of issues, he just doesnt have the political savy to do anything other than rant like a lunatic to his dozen or so regualar listeners. Robs heart may or may not be in the right place, he just doesnt have the brain to actually accomplish anything. All he ever did was ride his families coattails in the industry, and then let his dilusions of granduer go to his head, challenge the federal government, and lose miserably.

    If Rob knew anything more he would be screaming it from the rooftops, but he doesnt.
    Agents will not be allowed to rep performers who are not licensed. Producers will be required to keep a copy of the performer license, much like a fight promoter keeps records of the people they hire for events. The incentive is the penalty for not following the law, jutst like any other industry. (ps Cpan, thanks for wanting to hear my opinion)

  21. @jilted
    No thanks needed. You always provide a solid point of view. I don’t always have to agree, but I can see where you come from.

    Rob already compared the CA license to the MMA one in Vegas. That was a long time ago too. Way before this bill came to be. I’m not sure if he has a “say” in it. He’s not calling shots by any means. I think he is involved though. See where I’m going?

    People may have to report to him.

  22. I am still wait for those say there doing better job than Rob doing put there money where there moth is explain what more they have done than Rob has. It easy for people say they have done more for porn indusrty than Rob has yet they have hard time prove it. Has any one here had real effect on what FSC does in short no??? Has any one here done any thing stop risky business practices that killing off porn indusrty??? Has one here had real pair balls call out people that cause issues in porn other than Nick East or Kate who are not hide who they are at this blog site??? You can like or hate Rob but he not hide who he is on blog site he is not change postion on his issues becuase might offend people that pay him advertise on his web site becuase they might not like what he says. Buy way to those change issue being Rob Black Issue he not cover this Mike South is nice try change this from what is. What is that enough gone on in porn indusrty come to this point. The trouble for porn indusrty your all try change events that gotten indusrty to this point not gone work any more. Why not gone work excuses that have been used buy indusrty insure why these measures would go in effect have fail to point of embarrassment. No one outside porn indusrty beleaves porn indusrty doing any thing safe guard self or any body in it. To late stop these events from happening to late change events that happen make these events happen. Rob right about this one more major STD embarrassment happens in porn indusrty those have support indusrty about police it self gone turn on indusrty no matter who they are. Rob right about this those have balls toss stones at him have guts quite hide here go do some thing that better than what he doing. Other wise spare me about all thing has done for porn indusrty becuase talk about here doing nothing on matter means nothing.

  23. I am sorry did read any where here where Rob Black take credit for this event happening to porn indusrty. I think be frist person laugh at those think that he had power make event like this happen. I think Mike would be second person laugh think that Rob Black would have power make event like this happen.

  24. Cpan, I’m not sure I get what you mean by ‘people may have to report to him.’ I can guarantee you that convicted felon Rob Black will not be part of any legal licensing of any kind in the state of california.
    And i dont doubt that Rob has made overtures to AHF,OSHA, and state legislators, but thats a far cry from actually being involved in the process. Rob thinks that talking about it makes him part of it. Alot of what he says is right, actually its just common sense, which the porn industry is short on these days, which makes Rob stick out like a sore thumb. There is no way you will ever see Weinstien or Hall posing for a picture with Rob Black.

    So Rob, how many performers have signed up for that UAWA thingy? Would ZERO b

  25. @jilted

    Listen to the start of Black’s night show on the 13th. (Tonight) I think he just commented on your post. Don’t underestimate him yet.

    There is a lot he isn’t saying. I think he know more than most in regards to this.

    Just as I said, he doesn’t have a say, but he’s a part of it. If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. That’s what this industry is, isn’t it? He preyed on it. He talks about power moves within the industry because he knows he made one.

  26. I see what youre saying Cpan, but Rob doenst have any power in the industry. He isnt making any product, he isnt giving anybody any work, and he doesnt have two nickles to rub together. I know Rob reads my posts, I had a lunch meeting with one of the lawyers that used to be listed on the UAWA site.(their used to be two lawyers listed on the UAWA site, they arent there anymore)

    If you cant beat em, join em. Except Rob hasnt beaten anybody, and nobody is rallying behind him. There is an entire article on Adultfyi where Rob is talking about exactly what I have been pointing out about him, that HE himself is the biggest impediment to his success. You cant rally the troops by consistantly calling them retards. All of the changes that are coming for the industry are coming from powers that be outside the industry,OSHA, AHF, Legislators.

    ROb cares more about making HIMSELF the story, not solving the problems he rants about. The problems are real, and need real solutions, but Rob doesnt have the leadership qualities to get it done. If Rob was a serious as he says he is, and truely wants to help the performers, he would find someone the performers could get behind and hand over the reigns, but he will never do that because he is more interested in being Rob Black than actually achieving anything. Yes, Rob knows the industry history, but that industry that Rob was a part of for the most part does not exist anymore. Rob is taking credit for killing an industry that has been on its deathbed for a few years now.

    I guess the simple way to put this is, All of these things happening now, OSHA<AHF<Izzy, would still be happening even if Rob had never gotten involved, and these things will run their course no matter what rob says. Rob might be making waves in the industry, but he is a non factor in the real world.

  27. And there is no doubt that Rob reads Mike South every day. If mike made a nickel everytime Rob said MIKESOUTH, it would take about two hours for Mike to have every single penny in Robs pocket.

    Dont get me wrong, I wish I could support Rob, he knows what he’s talking about, and he is right on alot of issues. But just being right isnt enough when it comes to REAL world politics, you have to have support, and from the people you want to represent.

    Would you join an organization, or support as your leader someone who constantly calls you a retard? Rob is his own worst enemy and its really too bad. He coulda been a contenda, instead he became a cartoon character, and he knows it.

  28. Seriously?
    The “quit hiding behind a keyboard and a fake name” is getting so fucking old at this point.

    Many people who comment on here aren’t getting paid to be here. We’re here to state our opinions, debate issues and discuss possible solutions.

    If we’re not currently active in the adult industry then SO FUCKING WHAT? I don’t need to be a senator to have an opinion on governmental issues. I also don’t need to be a dentist to state my opinion that gloves should be worn while digging in someone’s mouth with a drill.

    You don’t need to know someone’s real name in order to listen to their opinion.

    Especially when they aren’t getting anything in return for giving up their anonymity.

    Porn stars don’t even use their real fucking names!

    Here’s a solution for you… you want my name, then pay for it:
    Mail a money order directly to my PO Box for $50K and I’ll send you my name on a really expensive certificate and you can frame that shit for all I care… (vagina, boobs and asshole pics. not included, btw. That would cost you $100K more…. and even THAT’S being generous.)

  29. Damn jilted! Your comments about Rob Black really pissed him off.
    To say he is not happy with you right now is an understatement!

  30. @Richard
    Lots of stuff is happening now that started ten years ago…stuff that’s getting off the ground now will make itself known in 10 or 20 years.

    The industry basically had a free pass until 2004 when HIV showed again. That’s when the game changed and outside pressure decided what the industry did after 1998 wasn’t good enough. Along the way it’s been gearing up with the tide going against the industry on the face of it.

    Lots of litigation in CA but they are also fighting in other states. In 2005 looked like 2257 was a done deal yet 2013 a new appeal in Cleveland (OH) Federal Circuit Court by FSC and 14 others. They didn’t win in one place so they try in a new playground.

    This fight is gonna get uglier and uglier, doesn’t matter how great a story Rob Black can tell, or how much history he knows, or how many of the players he knows personally as the game has been changing….he has less chance of moving this than I will.

  31. Rob Black is just a guy…as a felon he can’t sit on boards where policy is created. Unless he petitioned to restore his rights he can’t vote.

  32. Here my replye Lacy your right you do not need be in porn indusrty to give your opion to them. You do need powerful people who work in porn indusrty change the indusrty becuase people out side of it there opions well never change alone. What has any one Mike South done change any thing happening in porn indusrty ??? Come on people here time explain what changes have you done porn indusrty other than give your opion here?? Explain to world what have you done effect any than happen in porn indusrty??? What has your opion matter to what still takes place in porn indusrty?? Did any one other than Mike South who are any porn indusrty that real power players indusrty say good job thanks for your opion real change things?? Tell me Lacy has any one from FSC come out said wow Lacy opion from Mike South real matter to us sure that no. So Lacy if power be run porn do not care who are than why should care who you are?? After all would pay dime know who you are yet pay money know some one like Kayden Kross. I know she some one in porn indusrty have know what she meant porn indusrty Lacy. Goes for rest people want bag on Rob Black who fuck are you people why would care about your opion any more than I would Lacy. I know Rob has been in porn indusrty all his life longer most people bag on him here. Here thing why would care about opions from people who go great .lengths hide who they are from rest world. If would pay no Lacy opion why any one from real porn indusrty care know about here opion. After all Mike all state here that no one from FSC seem be reading his blog here so if not reading his blog here not reading any opion here to.

  33. Lol

    He is railing against the Internet how it’s a money loser…has he looked at APAP sure host our uploaded copyrighted stuff we aren’t gonna make you take the whole thing down..we are gonna charge the copyright owners 40 or 50% of revenue generated for affiliate income after we charge them for finding it on your site then we are gonna go after the end users via copyright trolling…can’t lose for the people sitting there laughing their asses off as he spiels each day.

    They are more scared of people like me…not while I’m here posting…cuz as long as I’m here spouting crap I’m not a real threat. But people like me are a worry because we do our homework and pass it on. We stack our research up and look for the right place to put it.

    That’s how I’ve been effective since LOSING a federal lawsuit that changed the application of ADA. Looking before I leaped at potential consequences if the great lawyer wanting to take my case pro bono to the Supreme Court lost..decided kids deserve medicine in schools and refused to let him have my stuff…he agreed with my choice five years later at Gobernatorial fundraiser. He was caught up in the good fight and didn’t think about losing…only winning. Btw..we lost the suit but won what we went to court for….know what you want, be willing to work to get and know the other guy is gonna fight tooth and nail.

  34. Actually in some states felons can vote nowadays. I know in Michigan they can if they meet the requirements that anyone else would have to meet (age, residency, picture ID). Also, the city of Flint just elected two felons (one a convicted murderer) to their city commission. I don’t know the rules in CA but it is possible that Rob could serve in government even with his felony convictions.

  35. I well agree with you jilted some time hard take Rob seriously with his style how makes his case. Yes watch his show on adultfyi one has wonder is this guy for real. How ever he been right been right on some subject that other people have wish he was wrong on. He there at groud zero of porn indusrty where others are not. He has balls call bull shit on thing that are bullshit. That not gone win him many friends in porn indusrty. But I have respect him on fact not gone back down hard subject or stop make point againt the people can make real change in porn indusrty are refuse to do so.

  36. I did sort of wonder what Lacey looks like but it isn’t worth $150K to find out. 🙂 May your husband seduce you, tie you to the bed by all four limbs and fuck you until you squirt and cum twenty times. 🙂

  37. @mharris127 –
    Were you fucking spying on us? I swear he already did exactly that to me about 2 hours ago!! 😉
    (Well, technically, I didn’t cum 20 times. But, I did cum about 5 times. So, yeah, it was definitely fun and the main reason I’m still awake at fucking 3am.) 😉

  38. @Richard373 –
    I think you would be amazed at the number of people who read both the MS site and the comments on a daily basis for a variety of reasons… Mainly AHF, FSC, Producers, Talent, etc.

    Although, I still think you’re missing the biggest point:
    I don’t want or need someone from the industry to pat me on the back and tell me “good job on your opinion.”

    That is not what I’m here for… I’m not looking for some kind of “approval” from ANYONE!
    If I state my opinion here on an issue and no one reads it, big deal… Just move on to the next one. But, I still have every right to voice my opinions whether I’m in the industry or not.

  39. The issue of performer licensing is one of those “won’t work” concepts. Groups like The EFF will come down the pike and point out that like it or not, it’s creation of art, and is protected free speech. Thus, limiting someone’s right to make this type of art in turn limits their free speech. You don’t even have to squint hard to see it.

    The real line is the question of “public place” versus “private place”. It’s very difficult to create law that would essentially stop amateurs from filming themselves having sex and selling it. Trying to draw a line and saying only “professionals” need a license would not pass the general legal sniff test, it stinks of prior restraint.

    I suspect this little push comes form the same group with the fake letter from a few months back. Lots of huff, very little puff.

  40. Lacey you be amzase how many people do not care what happening here on Mike blog site that work in porn indusrty do not spend time reading what happen here or at adultfyi. I still have right question who you are give your opion on inusdrty say you have right have opion on. Yes you have right not tell me I have right not care about your opion. But than have right ask what gives you right say some one like Rob Black wrong about his opion who still in neck deep in porn indusrty. I have right question any one say there opion matter in porn indusrty that can not prove any one why there opion matters in porn indusrty other than fact that they say so.Long stand joke in porn indusrty with people who have claim that there opions ones matter porn indusrty punchline joke was there opion only matter to them no one else. Here thing your not getting porn indusrty need more owen people have opion on these subjects than need people from outside give them theres on this matter. After all change in porn indusrty gone take place out side indusrty if does take place from inside indusrty from owen people. So far that change comes goes like the wind.

  41. I have agree with you there rawalex proof to all this is if happens. I have stoped counting how many times these event where gone take place than watch them all far apart last moment of last second gone happen. All,s know there many issue take place that I am sure Jerry Brown has on plate beside porn indusrty. With number people losing there health care over Obama care might be one issue he care over more special right now. So I agree with this not worth have debate on fact that this event turn out be nothing worth have debate over like all other events this kind happen so far.

  42. One can still work “with” the government and not be a part of them. There are a lot of things out there already where that is the case. I’m not suggesting that Rob will be part of the government. The UAWA isn’t going to be the government and Rob isn’t going to be a government employee.

    On a side note if you have the right connections you can have felonies and get a government job, but I think it becomes a problem if the job requires you to carry a gun. There are felons that work for the government, but very few. The employment process of every person has to be evaluated. The government can hire felons, but they don’t do it that often. Someone has to pull strings for you.

    If Rob did head to Sacramento for meetings with officials then there was a reason for it. If there aren’t plans to involve Rob somehow then why would they be interested in talking to him? Why would they waste their time even if they just wanted his opinion? It wouldn’t hurt to sit around and wait to see what happens.

  43. @Cpan,
    First, I too value the opinions you express here. You said there was no thanks necessary, but it is always nice to hear that someone puts any stock in your opinion.
    You wrote, “Why would they be interested in talking to him?” According to whom are they interested in him? According to Rob?
    I would like Rob to be successful, but his public behavior, five hours a day, is the biggest roadblock to his own success. It appears to me that he spends more time pushing people away, the very same people he wants to represent, than reaching out to them and building a solid platform on which to initiate change.
    I just dont see Rob reaching out to people. You cant call people retards and then expect them to line up behind you, its that simple. I hope when Rob reads this he sees it as a challenge to do better, constructive critisism. I would love nothing more than for him to prove me wrong. Producers and agents dont want change, and the majority pf performers are apathetic. Rob is asking, who can make change? Change for performers will only come with veteran performers insisiting on change, and I dont see Rob reaching out to the people who can make real change.

  44. I’m spying on the the INDUSTRY. I have to apologize for going off my rocker as I face deadlines for my research. The Holidays are here, and my family demands are ramping up again.

    Diane Duke…for a long time people have been calling for her to be fired or resign because she is doing a poor job representing the industry.
    Looking into what Diane Duke’s job is at FSC, she knows her job and does it well! She earns $ by putting on a happy face saying we care about the industry…in real speak…we care about protecting the money coming into our pockets and covering our asses.

    She is paid to PROTECT the INTERESTS of the STAKEHOLDERS who are paying her. Those stakeholders may not like being called names or hearing they are despised but the next morning they meet up and say…
    Diane are you keeping the OSHA wolves away? She is so they are good and her right hand Joanne is helping her do a fine Job. (Nick mentioned employees who left because they didn’t like the conflict of interest with what they they thought Diane should be doing…no she is paid to ignore those calls. That is how the game is played.)

    Kevin Bland and Karen Tynan are two attorneys along with their support staff to make it all happen. Not only their support staff but affiliated attorneys filing cases in other jurisdictions to make camaflaging case law.

    So the STAKEHOLDERS at the FSC are laughing all the way to the bank ignoring Rob Blacks calls for performer safety today just like they did when he was on the hook for obscenity charges. No skin off their backs doesn’t matter how much they take off yours in the mean time!

    So yeah when I see this huge legitimate industry in America today..A pioneer for for 1st amendment rights making a mockery of what made that amendment possible I’m a bit pissed off and willing to spy and put my time and resources into action. They forgot EQUAL.

    I’m pissed because these STAKEHOLDERS are more interested in lining their pockets saying were a unique 1st amendment industry holding back society instead of really taking the EQUAL and FREE and wow can you imagine?

    This industry isn’t unique…I don’t care how special the FSC thinks it is…the rules apply to the adult industry just like every other industry in America.

    So I’ll work behind the scenes to apply EQUAL rules to the industry.

  45. @richard373 –
    Nick East isn’t technically his real name.
    Rob Black isn’t technically his real name.
    Mike South isn’t technically his real name.
    richard373 sure as hell isn’t your real name.
    kate is obviously not her/his real name.
    jilted isn’t his real name.
    LurkingReader isn’t her real name.
    mharris127 isn’t his real name.
    rawalex isn’t his real name.
    Lacey Blake isn’t my real name.
    CPanzram isn’t her real name.
    BT isn’t his real name.

    So, explain to me again why you continually keep calling people out for sitting behind a keyboard using fake names?

    Especially when you, yourself, use a fake name?????

  46. Excuse me, Lacey? Really? Nick East isn’t ‘technically’ my real name? Well, it’s still me and I’m not hiding in anonymity! Want to see who I am? Use google, eh? Hi everyone, it’s me!!!! Now, what name does Diane Duke use when she comments here? Or Michael Fattorosi? Or Joanne Capastrano? Or Marci Hirsch? Why do THEY hide their true identities, Lacey? Why? Who is sachertorte? She sure seems to know an awful lot, eh? But she hides behind a FAKE name!!! Again, Lacey, want my real name? Michael Scott Turner is my REAL name and I am the author of “The Orion Compass” (available as a kindle for 4.99). Now, who else here has the balls to show who they REALLY are, eh?

  47. @LurkingReader –
    Very well stated!
    It’s interesting to point out that most change, in any industry, happens behind the scenes due to people actually researching issues and working instead of screaming and bitching at everyone for not using a real name, sitting behind a keyboard or, the best one, your not even in the industry line… Give me a fucking break.

    Just keep on screaming and bitching and I’ll be over here in my little cave researching the important stuff in order to send it to the people who actually ARE capable of making changes. Because, I’m sure as hell not delusional enough to think that somehow I can make any changes by myself…

    There is no reason for me to constantly tell people exactly what I’m doing to help the situation.
    I owe absolutely no one an explanation about how I may be contributing to this issue in public or behind the scenes.

  48. My real name is obviously NOT Kate? Actually it IS lacey… and I am a female…
    Believe it or Not…

  49. DUH!!! Because Nick East is the name he is known for…
    People know who he is!!!

    Rob Black also states his real name as well … A lot!
    But he goes by the name Rob Black because that’s the name he’s known for…

  50. Did you know mike’s real last name isn’t south?
    But mike is known as Mike South…
    people know who he is!
    It might not be his real last name… but he’s not hiding in anonymity trying to bully people..

    People KNOW who mike is!

  51. Wow! Lacey? Really? Do your homework before you try bullying me, k? On facebook I have two accounts. One in both names! Rob’s last name is Zakari, (sp?) , okay? WE are not hiding behind a fake persona trying to convince the authorities that we’re simple housewives from the midwest who REALLY care A LOT about porn performers supposed RIGHT to be condom free!!! Do you understand now, Lacey?

  52. http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=60204

    This article appears to address some of the comments I have made here. And this article contains a perfect example of why Rob has not been successfull in getting performers to back him.

    Rob asks,”Who are the industry leaders”(in so many words) Well here you go Rob, the answers you’ve been looking for. You need veteran talent to back you. You need the likes of Lisa Ann, Jenna Haze, Belladonna, Evan Stone, Lexington Steele. You need performers who others respect, who are successful. You need to reach out and INCLUDE people.

    Charity Bangs is a great example. On this very site I have pointed out the flaws in her plan, but you Rob need to reach out to performers like her, not ridicule her. In my opinion you should have reached out to her and said,”Thank you for wanting to make change for performers. Thank you for speaking out, I hope we can get together and talk about what you think can be done, maybe we can find common ground, maybe you can talk to other performers and get ideas from them. I need performers like you who want change to come together and reach out to other performers.

    Same thing for Mike Kulich. You should have reached out and said basicly the same thing, “Thank you for wanting to make things better for performers, lets get together and discuss our ideas.”

    Instead you just ridicule and alienate them.

    YOU asked who are the people who can make change, and then ridicule anyone who speaks up. It shouldnt matter that the first ideas these two put forward might not work to well, but to completely alienate people who want change just like you is counter productive.

    You cant build anything by pushing people away.

  53. So, we now have Patricia, Kate and Lacey as possibilities. Any other names you want to throw in there?

    Although, it still doesn’t answer the question of why it’s ok for you to use a fake name, but not anyone else?

    Oh, and your legal last name would be?

    And throw in your SS# while you’re at it so I can run a background check and credit report to see exactly who I’m talking to on here… thanks.

  54. @Lacey: Really? Bullying Kate now? Now be a good girl and point the gun at me, k? Bully me instead, please? Show everyone your true colors some more by ignoring my simple questions!!!! Brilliant! I really can picture a little girl on the grade school playground sticking out her tongue and sneering “Oh, yeah, if your name is Michael then why don’t you go by that” and then sticking her thumbs in her ears mimicking a moose as she sticks her evil little tongue out again!!! Then, of course, she turns to see if her little grade school peers are laughing with her at me!!!! Here, Lacey Lacey, Lacey!! Oh, Lacey? I hear you like James “never caught an STD” Deen? So you like gay guys, eh? Or more to the point, maybe you get paid to promote his image as the guy all the girls have a crush on? Kinda like when Ricky Nelson’s dad paid girls to run up to him screaming and fainting in order to make other girls think he was all of that and a bag of chips? I can see Joanne, Diane, Marci, and Michael all commenting there acting like midwestern housewives and bullying anyone who disagrees with his party stance (hazmat suits, lol) and trying to convince the world that he is a heartthrob to teenage girls everywhere!!! Give it up, Lacey, stop bullying Kate and bully me instead!!!

  55. WOW..NOOOOO Lacey!!! Not this crap again!!!
    it’s getting as old as your act!
    Do you think you can find someone else to bully!
    Talk about being desperate for attention… Does it never end with you?
    What’s this weird obsession you have with me?

    You say you’re married?
    And you come on Mike’s blog acting like a 12 year old desperate for attention bully? You are laughable!

    And you say you have all these jobs? accountant .., stuntwoman?
    When do you go to work?
    How do you have sooo much free time to come on here to bully people like me!! I would assume you would be too busy. LOL

    Lacey? you can continue to make an ass out of yourself if you choose too..
    That’s up to you! But I am not going to argue with you… because I know that’s what you want… Lacey NEEDS attention!
    I am tired of you and your bullying… You are a joke! LOL.

    See lacey ..what you don’t understand.. it’s bullies like you that need to identify yourself… not the ones who don’t bully like Richard or jilted..
    The reason you bully is because you’re a coward hiding behind a fake name!

    But Lacey.. I LOVE your response… it is so intelligent! LOL

  56. I think you’re both missing my ENTIRE point!!!!!!!

    What reason was there to create the name Nick East in the first place? Did you just not like your own name?

    WHY would someone need 2 different names? Get it??

  57. It doesnt matter what someones real name is or isn’t it doesnt make someones opinion any more or less valid because he goes by Mike South instead of Mike Strother, Whe i chose the name Mike South it was purely a branding considerartion, it was easier to pronounce and spell correctly and IT FIT ME.
    Had I know that years later some shit stain named Donny Long would come along and wreak havoc on people in the biz, myself included I’d have been a lot more careful with my real name.

    Point being I dont care what someones real name is, if they are here the opinions and ideas are relevant and I dont blame anyone for using a handle, it’s the SMART thing to do these days, Maybe Lacey doesn’t want a potential future employer to google her real name and read her posts here….or BT OR Kate or whomever…You are here and your opinions matter to me if they didnt Id just close the comments….You guys have influence over me and I, in turn, arguably have influence in the biz. I dont comment in the comments a lot because My ideas are right on the front page and if that changes, the new ideas will be on the front page too.
    Anyway bickering over the validity of someones ideas because they dont use a real name here is, well, kinda childish dont yall think?

  58. Cmon people, really, this bullshit AGAIN. No opinion here, not even mine, is more important than the subject being debated. I always ask myself, “Is this comment adding anything to the debate, and for the record the answer is not always yes. That being said maybe y’all can ask yourselves the same question. This does nothing but play directly into the hands of people who dont want these subjects debated in any intelligent way.

  59. When I consider the comments here and how passionate everyone is about their beliefs it gives me great appreciation for what the framers of our constitution accomplished. If you look at the history it was not an easy task to come to agreement on many things, but they did and it wasnt as trivial as whether or not condoms should be used in porn….it was forging the new government of an entire nation…we are a better country for it.

  60. You can thank lacey and her buddies like Sachertorte for starting this bullshit .. bullying..

    I will not be responding to these people again!
    Their behavior is pathetic!
    And I don’t want any part of it!

  61. With the holidays approaching so is my research deadline. I got wrapped up in putting the pieces together matching facts here and there which is good for policy but not when commenting along the way. This project was isolating for a mainstream suburban housewife and yes I became a bully…I’m sorry. I see how isolated and overbearing I’ve become in a world where much of what I’m moving through for research simply isn’t discussed. We think ATM is where we go to use our debit card for cash. With that out on the table…my head now out of my ass 🙂

    Wrote that to send via email…now heartened to read the interim posts…love this site ..apology still stands (definitely not a crystal cox lol)

  62. Great so while Black is lining up the best of the best in porn to fight does he know he’s still gonna lose? He’s trying to bring a bigger toy to a gun fight..the legal fight and the FSC has been lining up the best of the best constitutional and labor attorneys since day one.

  63. Gee Wiz,
    An anonymous poster(well not really anonymous, alot of industry people know who i am) on a hillbilly website gets his little pair of spedos all bunched up. Maybe I should change my name to “The Mirror” Rob, just prove me wrong, that would be the best thing you could do, and i do truely hope you do it. I doubt you will, but shit, hell just might freeze over one day.

    So Rob, how many of the ‘retards’ you keep referring to have signed up for the UAWA? How many performers are tweeting and blogging about how they are behind you? How many current performers are you bringing with you to those high level meetings? I put the over and under on this at ZERO.

  64. @Nick East & @Patricia/Kate/Lacey –

    Are you done with your ridiculous overly dramatic anti-bullying campaign yet?

    Just a reminder that you STILL haven’t even answered one question yet?
    The questions were not all that difficult..
    1. Why did you adopt the name Nick East in the beginning instead of using your real name? What purpose was it created for?

    2. How can you, kate, bitch about people not using their real first & last name when you yourself use a completely fake single name (or supposedly 3 of them at this point???)

    Seriously, these questions are not that hard.. Nor, are they unreasonable…

    So, what exactly is the problem with just answering them instead of freaking out about the fact that you somehow think your being bullied?

    Someone asking a question that you either don’t want to answer or don’t have an answer for is NOT bullying… Do you even know what bullying is? You seem to have a fundamental understanding of how “to bully people”, but seem to be lacking in the understanding of what it means to actually “get bullied by someone else?”

  65. I would just like to state for the record that it is completely fucking ridiculous that my FIRST thought when seeing ATM has now become: Ass To Mouth.

    Pathetic. 😉

  66. @jilted
    I agree. I still think that Rob has something in motion that we don’t know about or the whole truth, but being a little nicer may improve reactions to what may occur and to get more breaks. At times you have to power down the shtick. If done correctly he could make it quite effective.

    When I was younger and my grandmother asked me what I wanted for Christmas I would say things like Barbie, My Pet Monster, and Popples. If I ended it with “bitch”, “cunt”, “retard”, “I know about your drinking problem”, and “we all know those teeth and the hair aren’t real” then I probably wouldn’t have even gotten the Legos I would always get instead of anything I asked for.

    When I said those in Sacramento being “interested” in him I only said that because if you are asked to go to Sacramento to speak to them then they are obviously interested in you. I don’t think he showed up uninvited and rang the doorbell until they finally let him in. There was definitely interest in him for him to go there. He was asked to be there. Why? (There are things we aren’t being told)

    I’ll take stock in the opinions of all until I discover that their opinions have no value. You, like Rob, have said more things that I agree with than disagree with in regards to business and the industry. Your opinion has value just like a lot of others on here.

    Nick East talking to angels and writing a book about it is kinda weird though. I don’t mean to offend, but I’m being honest. Your stock value has dropped.

  67. Lacey, it’s pretty simple law here:

    If the only way you can create art is by obtaining a license, that by definition stops some art from being created – or at least delayed. Think about it in simple terms: if you cannot freely speak without a license, or face legal action for exercising your free speech without said license, then that speech is impeded.

    I want to make a porn movie right now. It’s art, it’s protected free speech. But wait, I can’t do it until I fill out the right form, get a government license as a performer, and if they approve of the license, then I can consider making a porn movie… that stops my immediate free speech.

    Moreover, if the licensing process makes people not want to make the “art” in question, for whatever reason (too time consuming, don’t want to register, whatever) it is a clear chilling effect on free speech.

    Free speech delayed is free speech limited.

    Generally, the legal argument for registration is that it furthers a public / government interest, in this case a health and welfare issue. But there is no indication that forcing adult movie performers to obtain a license to be a performer would advance that agenda, and the harm to free speech created by such prior restraint / chilling effects is much more significant than any public good that can be advanced.

  68. @rawalex
    I think it goes more like if you want to perform art of this nature then you have get a license and the guy who tricks out an old caddy has to do the same to drive it in a show.

    If you get the license then doing the art isn’t impeded and with safety regulations in place then the licensing can be validated. Can I go and light fires in a pattern on the ground on my own property in the name of art or do I have to get permits to do so? I’m going to need permits to burn my lawn. Are they interfering with my art process? No. They’re just making sure I don’t burn my house down and the neighbors with it.

  69. CPanzram: Thanks for advertising Nicks book!
    And I don’t mean to offend.. but your opinion on Nick doesn’t matter because you don’t matter. I’m just being honest! 🙂

  70. @kate

    I agree. I never said that I did matter. We are talking about opinions. They’re like assholes. We’ve all licked them at one point in time.

    In my opinion I feel that people who talk to guardian angels and seek guidance from them are batshit mental. That’s just how I feel.

    (This is the part where you convince me to buy the version to read on my Kindle)

  71. Really, Lacey? 1. I was a performer. EVERYONE changes their name to protect their privacy and prevent stalking! How do you not know that? Now for a question that you will not answer… Is it possible that NOBODY from the FSC is commenting on this board? Is it possible that the FSC is simply allowing midwestern housewives who lust over a gay prostitute to argue their case here without their help? Really? And why do you keep calling kate ‘Patricia’? Is that supposed to be an insult? How is that NOT bullying her? You claim she was on the gay prostitute’s blog and now she’s here because sachertorte and laura and you bullied her away? I am not having problems with outsiders who are commenting here anonymously, but if any members from the FSC are in fact commenting here anonymously, that is dishonest as hell!

  72. Another personal attack against me!!! CPanzram, you are a liar! YOU DO MEAN TO OFFEND!!! And wake up and realize that as soon as I took my clothes off in front of a camera my stock value dropped to the floor and couldn’t possibly get any lower! But sell more books for me, eh? All you guys (satan, I’m looking at you) have shown me is how absolutely nobody cares enough to click on that link and watch my little story. Now go back to believing that Jesus came back from the dead after three days, and calll me crazy, k? Hey Mike, are you noticing that I’m being personally attacked though I haven’t personally attacked anyone here AT ALL? That is, unless someone from the FSC is in fact commenting here and taking offense but too cowardly to come out and admit who their cowardly asses are!!! And I agree that my situation is weird, but you wouldn’t know that unless you actually watched the video and read the book (available on kindle for 4.99, great Christmas gift for the kiddies!!!), so your little plug for my book is actually appreciated!!! If you want to belittle me, please explain why I deserve belittling, okay?

  73. CPAN… You prove my point about what I was saying earlier.
    You cpan are hiding behind a fake name… You come on here and you attack Nick East for no reason… other then you CAN because YOU know who he is… He can’t do the same thing to you because he doesn’t know who you are… so he can’t up load a video .. dig into your background and mock you …
    I mean he can call you an asshole.. but he doesn’t know who YOU are.. you are a coward! What the hell did he do to you that you felt the need to attack him and give us you opinion on him?

    If Nick wanted to he could hide behind a fake name like bob…. and you wouldn’t know who he was…so you wouldn’t be able to up load videos and attack him… and give your opinion that DOESN”T MATTER…
    That is what makes nick awesome! He doesn’t hide and he laughs at attacks from people like you… Nicks a nice guy. Who the hell are you to judge him or give your so called opinion on him.. when you don’t even know him?

    By the way CPAN… Your attack was real original!
    Someone uploaded this video like 2 weeks ago and said I believe the same thing about nick… was that you? if it wasn’t then you need to keep up to date with the attacks on Nick… lol

    That’s how I feel!

    And you can buy the kindle version of Nicks book for $4.99. Thanks for reminding me and thanks again for proving my point!

  74. So now I’m ‘batshit mental’? So you don’t believe in Guardian Angels? Now I am taking offense at your little digs against me, because it is beyond obvious that you are in fact trying to make fun of me!!!!!

  75. @nick
    Settle down. We’ve met before a long time ago. You were friends with someone I refuse to talk to anymore. She introduced us.

    After meeting you and seeing that video my best suggestion is to delete that video and act like nothing ever happened.

    I even admit that at under 5 dollars I want to read it.

    Nick’s a good guy. Maybe not the best author, but he means well. He’s got heart.

  76. @nick
    I’m sorry, but this comes totally out of left field. Did you not think that others may feel as though there is a certain level of absurd involved in your published works? I never published anything I’ve written because I don’t want people on mikesouth.com telling me that I’m batshit mental.

    I’m seriously intrigued to see what you’ve written after seeing that video.

    I wish you the best my friend. I’m not attacking. I’m just pointing out my opinions which mean nothing.

  77. Great excuse CPAN.. if nick wouldn’t remember your name then it’s because you are NOT worth remembering.. COWARD!

    and you have never published anything you have written because you don’t want anyone on mikes blog to call you crazy..
    umm.. you are hiding behind a fake name on here..
    how the hell would anyone know you wrote a book let alone be made fun of for it? lol

    Thanks for outing yourself CPAN….
    And you’re saying you’re rob blacks number one fan? right?

  78. @CPanzram: nope, you are confusing a right (free speech) with a priviledge (driving). Making a porn movie isn’t a priviledge, it’s a free speech right. Making a porn movie is no different from writing up your “world domination” tract and handing it out on a street corner. It’s free, protected speech.

    As for your lawn example, you have to understand that your rights to do with your own property end where they can affect the rights of others. Burning your lawn for yourself isn’t a real issue, the smoke and such caused by it creates a public harm and thus, isn’t the art issue, it’s the pollution issue, the safety issue, and so on.

    None of your examples are free speech examples.

    Could you imagine a world where you have to get a license before you can buy a computer, because you MIGHT type something, you might express yourself? How about a license for a video camera, where you have to have a university degree in order to have access? Perhaps a manditory licensing fee for the use of a photocopier or making duck face pictures for face book… all good examples of things that could be regulated if you regulate other forms of free speech art.

  79. @rawalex

    Let’s say you are right. There is a gay company. They have a lot of fans wanting to see a willing participant get gangbanged by others with HIV and no condoms are being used. Treasure Island Media is all about that. Getting HIV is the fantasy. Google it. It is out there. What’s the art? You can get easily get non infected people and have them perform as though they are.

    When I write up my manifesto people aren’t getting HIV or being exposed to Hep C. See what I’m getting at? Huge difference.

  80. @CPanzram: According to a good friend of mine, Mark Randazza loves the term ‘batshit mental’!!! And the Randazza Legal Group advertises here, so… Hmmmmm?

  81. So CPAN? nick’s view on Gonz wouldn’t be one of the reasons you attacked nick would it?
    You are Rob Black’s number one fan… Is he maybe the reason you attacked Nick?

    Come on ! Spill It CPAN! Why did a loser like you … who is hiding behind a fake name.. attack nick? You rarely commented on here … now all of a sudden .. you have lots to say… and you are attacking Nick East!

    Give us the REAL reason CPAN! Enquiring minds want to know!

  82. His name is Marc Randazza? His legal group advertises here? He is a lawyer in Vegas? Mr. Mojo Risin’ likes rearranging the letters in his name I guess (mr. mojo risin is Jim Morrison’s anagram)

  83. My thoughts on Lacy is does any one from porn indusrty real come here read any one opions on here. I well say this to be fair I doubt alot porn indusrty going over adultfyi reading Rob Black opion. It been long time sent I have seen any who is major porn indusrty power come here say wow people on blog site has had any effect on what they been doing in porn indusrty. I mean opions are great unless they make effect change in what happening in porn indusrty than they are worthless. Rob did make good point why not getting porn stars backing him simple changes he want take place are againt very people that pay porn stars be in there movies so they have simple chose support Rob Black or never work at porn company pay them work again. That why porn stars likey Lisa Ann well never say any thing about Brazzer or than thing else about porn indusrty unless from her owen twitter feed where she can control her owen opion how be used. Come think if that may be very reason where not seeing any real porn stars here in long time offer up there opions here. Be fair again Mike on this have wonder FSC place gag order out porn stars what can say talk about in porn indusrty. There been long strech nothing come from porn stars that this stuff well effect. Let me be clear on this going back subject this effect porn stars not porn company or talent agency. The porn star like strippers who have pay be license some place pay for that license out there owen pocket. As cleary shown above the license for stripper ever costly back round check they do would prevent many porn star from working in porn indusrty at all. So think you hear some porn stars speaking out about that gues what porn indusrty all but been quite as sheep on issue.

  84. @Kate
    Isn’t Rob friends with Nick?

    My name is Rachel. I know of one person on here who knows my full name.

    Attacked Nick? The guy wrote a book and published it about his relationship with an angel. If he was talking to a potato I would probably do the same. That wasn’t an attack. I was just pointing out obvious absurd behavior that he brought to my attention.

    Nick, c’mon. Mr. Randazza would advise you that there is nothing that he can do about me calling you batshit mental and would probably advise you to stop writing and advertising your works. Angels? Ying yang? You said it and made a video. Not me. I didn’t even know who you were until you gave a plug and I searched for your book and saw you in the vid and thought “I know that guy”. You were a very nice man that later on went to write a really weird book. That’s not my fault.

  85. “I was a performer. EVERYONE changes their name to protect their privacy and prevent stalking! How do you not know that?”
    Exactly, that’s my reason too for not wanting to publish my real information. Worried mainly about my family or me getting harassed, google search issues, privacy issues, etc.

    “Now for a question that you will not answer… Is it possible that NOBODY from the FSC is commenting on this board? Is it possible that the FSC is simply allowing midwestern housewives who lust over a gay prostitute to argue their case here without their help?”
    Yes, it is definitely possible that no one from the FSC comments on here…
    Why would you think I’m posting on here for the FSC when I’m completely AGAINST the FSC?
    Where on here have I EVER defended the FSC?

    If “kate” is not “Patricia,” then she has a long lost sister who can think and write EXACTLY like her, even down to the pathetic writing and insults she constantly uses……
    I mean, what a coincidence that “Patricia” gets kicked off of Deen’s blog and the next day she shows up here as “kate” sounding EXACTLY like “Patricia.”
    Could just be a huge coincidence, but I seriously doubt it???

    And, who in the fuck is the gay prostitute you keep referring to? When did a gay prostitute enter the picture?

  86. CPAN?? Who is this one person who knows you?
    YOU ARE SOOO FULL OF SHIT!!!
    You attacked him not once but twice!!!
    Who the hell are you to judge him!!! What do you care what he believes in? How does that affect you?

    Who the hell are you REALLY?
    You’re a liar! And like all trolls.. you’re an idiot!
    and a bad actor.

  87. Simple version my blog Lacy where is any one from porn indusrty who this gone effect at voice there displeasure over this??? Wait I am hear crickets from those people on this blog site. Come on Lacy people that this mean alot to think have opion on it. They all had opion on condom issue STD issues they did hide who they where but not give opion on this matter. You think if this was important matter they come say so but guees what there not saying so. All proves Lacy that people this effect do not real care this gone happen to them or does matter them.

  88. And you didn’t answer the question…CPAN
    Are you Rob Blacks number one fan?
    And you did defend and make excuses for Gonz… You admit it right?
    I mean I did find your comments…

    And there has to be a reason you attacked nick… and don’t give me that bullshit it’s because of some book he wrote years ago!!!

    What’s the REAL reason CPAN?

  89. I do not care what call your self Lacy untill you can prove why would think your opion be worth more than any one know in adult indusrty that effect buy these thing is what worth. That issue that. You can get opions from horse ass or horse mouth I rath get my opions from horse mouth than horse ass. I want know how porn stars who gone be effect buy this feel not people that has nothing to do with them.

  90. @Nick & Kate

    Kate as I understand it is your girlfriend in no way related to the Industry. Do you think it helps either of your credibility to have her stand at your side parroting paranoia that anyone you don’t know to be in your clique is against you? Or here to beat you up?

    In the last three months I’ve learned more ugly sordid crap about this world than I ever wanted to know…when someone keeps attacking my right to post anonymously I have to start to wonder why…

    What do they hope to gain…that’s a scary fucking thought for a Midwest homemaker who has no Interest in having websites created In herself or family names or having 990 info posted for non profit boards she is part of posted and critiqued by people who don’t like her stance on performer safety.

  91. @raw

    Had an interesting convo with a constitutional expert…left Me dazed and confused of course.

    He makes several points….the chilling argument for licensing isn’t made by performers it is made by employers to whom it would not apply as the employer isn’t chilled because their performer is licensed.

    Cam models might be chilled but as a solo would not need licensing and therefore would not be chilled…oh he went on and on..

    He previously brought up many points of artists being limited by the use of their medium, restricted to to time and place…sculptors, welders, hazardous materials and more and license requirements to use materials in pursuit of their art. Where it was held that it was NOT a chilling effect.
    He brought up artists who wanted to continue use of hazardous materials and were denied…under the equal…he keeps laughing at me saying “dear remember the first amendment may give freedom but it is the constitution that makes us equally free to pursue those freedoms.
    Trust me..this guy knows case law…it’s his porn!

    Basically the FSC has a good argument why artists shouldn’t be chilled but forgets performers are employees. And as employees are already chilled. So the conundrum continues.

  92. Lol my point exactly..not exactly “over the fence chat” in suburbia with bikes trikes and hoops in most driveways 🙂

  93. @Lacey
    Roflmao…you lust after a gay prostitute? I know I don’t…wouldn’t watch a flick if you paid me 🙂 gay straight or otherwise. (Some people are so bat shit crazy they can’t keep anything straight) 🙂

  94. @Lacey: What is your obsession with “Patricia”? And NO, it is not possible that the FSC would allow these comments to go unchecked. And I never said you personally were FSC! And why would you get grief for posting on this site? It’s not like you’re getting naked on camera, eh? And the gay prostitute is James “lived out of his car at 18 and never caught an STD” Deen. Haven’t you read the stories about how he got the role in “The Canyons” and his gay love scene in that movie? And didn’t he advertise on Pamela Peaks website for escorting? And your ‘proof’ that Kate is Patricia is ludicrous at best, lol!!! You must be ‘batshit mental’ (to use Marc Randazza’s favorite expression) out of your mind to make such a ridiculous assumption! And to think you’d get ‘repercussion’s’ for letting us know your real name is also insulting! But do you see how I’ve done the same thing by proclaiming that CPranzam is in fact Marc? And I can see where a lawyer would want to keep his involvement with adult film companies a secret from his peers, but I’m sure it’s him because of similar reasons. Now how do I sound, eh? You just had to go and prove yourself to be a bully, eh? If nobody from the FSC is influencing any of these comments, I’ll eat my hat, k? Now please just leave me and Kate alone and go pick on somebody you can bring to tears, ya big bully!

  95. @Lacey…..It is not a coincidence….Kate is indeed Patricia… It would just take a little research on Deens blog (a month back or so)for anyone to realize it…….and for those of you that don’t understand why this is even important to point out, all you have to do is read a couple of her comments to understand why its concerning and gives us perspective on her state of mind…. but in her defense I do have to say she seems to be doing better here ..still instigating and what I see as bullying…but to a much lesser extent…. as for anyone bullying her off James Deens site that’s revisionist history and just not so…..as for the whole gay prostitute accusations, I believe that stems from Deens recent interview stating he participated in some early teen male experimentation…and i think Nick may be confusing you with me… oh and my name is actually Laura….not a lot of information but like you its important to keep my anonymity from work related matters and such.

  96. @Richard….i think its valuable to hear what many different people from different walks of life have to say on these matters and i think Mike does too…Lacy is obviously very interested and educated on these topics and many others on here that aren’t performers or in the industry…. its always nice to hear first hand from performers as well, but i can understand the reluctance to do so on their part …. they definitely need a Norma Ray!….but i see some budding aspirations.

  97. Don’t confuse workplace rules (ie, OSHA acts) with licensing acts. Specific requirements for the employer to provide a safe work environment and all stand no matter which way this particular wind blows. If your take on Treasure Island is correct, they would certainly be a likely candidate of OSHA style action, no matter what. Again, willing participant or not, knowingly providing an unsafe work environment is enough to get the employer in trouble.

    Remember that obscene or illegal acts are NOT protected by the first amendment. Try to remember that, it’s very important. Material that is considered obscene or that is illegal does not come with the same protections.

    You are going a long way to avoid the simple point: Licensing would make it illegal for just anyone to pick up a camera and fuck for cash, pure and simple. Girlfriend videos? Home made porn? Camgirls? Forget about it. They would all need to be licensed professionals to work. No more “stolen” porn movies, because there is no way that Kim Kardashian is going to get a pornstar license to be able to see her next master work (and you can tell it’s coming one day). If those people’s right to express themselves is limited, then they are victims of prior restraint.

  98. @Raw

    Not confused…this is to address performers in adult films who are in fact employees. This isn’t about regulating the art it is about workplace safety. Look at what the licensing bill is for…then go look at history. Look at march 2012 meeting at OSHA where FSC has two lawyers fighting to keep OSHA from doing a policy that clear up EMPLOYEE because they like using the ambiguous camouflage of obscure and unrelated case law.

    Solo Cam girls would not need a license…they are not employing (using) any other human (Aka hazardous materials) in the pursuit of their art. But the moment they wanted to bring another human onto their camera a license would be required. No different than an artist who uses hazardous materials….don’t forget the EQUAL part of what holds up the freedoms. Other art forms must be licensed to utilize the hazardous material of their creation.

    Despite all the diseases of the human body we can probably be glad it isn’t asbestos…look what happened to the insulation industry. Before we had tyvek we had pink fiberglass to replace it. This isn’t a first amendment issue it’s a COGS issue.

  99. This has been a pretty spirited discussion. Some of it has focused on the First Amendment, as did a lot of the discussion on Luke Is Back and statements by James Deen and others about condoms.

    When it comes to the actual issue of porn, almost all of that discussion is misguided even if it is passionate.

    Now, I wrote something like that on Luke Is Back a year or so ago and got flamed, including a response by the Colonel – or whoever that guy was – who said he would try to explain things simply to me but I was probably too stupid to even understand so why bother.

    Now, that guy may have had a point – my wife says I’m probably too stupid to understand on a daily basis, and she knows me better than anyone but my mom (who likes her more than me).

    So, don’t take my word for it. Read the actual lawsuit that Vivid argued in court and then read the opinion of the federal judge who found in favor of the law.

    If you read the suit filed by Vivid, Kayden and some guy who didn’t even know why his name was in there, what you’ll find is that they barely mentioned the First Amendment.

    The heart of the Vivid suit was an economic argument. Vivid said the consumer does not want to watch porn with condoms and its business will be adversely affected.

    Kayden said that she films scenes for her website in her home, which is a jurisdiction covered by the law. If enforced, she would have to rent locations in areas that are unaffected by the law to shoot condomless porn and she couldn’t afford to do that. She’d be out of business. So much for Kayden making so much money, she can retire from porn and never make a day in her life – a location fee is going to break her bank.

    The guy said that fewer scenes would be shot, hence, he would have fewer opportunities to work and would have to get a real job to pay his rent.

    As to the judge’s opinion, he said that porn mentioned the First Amendment in its argument, it was highly unlikely to prevail on that argument, so lets move on. I just gave more attention to the First Amendment and the condom issue than a federal judge. Now, that may not seem like much to you or I as a laymen, but if you talk to lawyers, they will tell you should read a judge’s casual dismissal of something as if it was written in all caps, underlined, bolded, highlighted in yellow, and delivered at the top of his lungs. He’s telling you that you just wasted his time.

    Finally, the judge rejected most of porn’s economic arguments. The one bone he threw to porn was economic.

    So, again, to anyone who wants to shout about the First Amendment and regulation of porn, read what your industry actually argued in court and what a judge has actually said. At least when it comes to condoms, the industry did not make much of a First Amendment argument in court and the judge threw it out the window.

    Now, when it comes to licensing talent, porn cannot make the same weak economic argument it made about condoms. Talent and not the porn industry will probably pay the license fee. And, unless government does something stupid like say you have to pay a $10,000 fee to be porn talent, it will only be a hurdle to 18 year old high school drop outs – who can make back the $250 or $500 fee with their first onfilm blow job. The Lisa Anns of the world may grumble, but they’ll pay it easily.

    Second, there’s been some discussion here about art, prior restraint, etc. Here’s the thing: The First Amendment does not guarantee freedom of art. Again, don’t take my word for it. Google the First Amendment.

    It protects the free expression of religion, the right of the press to operate without government interference and the right of individual speech. The word art does not appear in the amendment.

    I could be wrong, but I believe that is probably because of the old phrase: Art is in the eye of the beholder. The government cannot say what is and what isn’t art. So again, the First Amendment does not define art or protect art. It protects speech.

    Now, porn cannot argue that it is a religion – I may like a big booty, but Jules Jordan’s Ass Worship is not one of the sacraments.

    Likewise, in the age of the Internet, bloggers and special interest websites, the law has been challenged to define just what is the press and who is a reporter. It has struggled with that. But, the general test has been whether a reporter or organization is reporting or opining on the important events of the day. I believe AdultFYI, Mike South, AVN and other industry sites would find freedom of the press protection under the law. Love them or hate them, they have both reported and commented on the events of the day. The condom, OSHA and now licensing debates are great examples.

    And by the way, the government is allowed to issue press passes that restrict who can perform their reporting duties at the White House or in Congress. It can’t stop me from launching a blog to write opinions about the Congress or the President, but it can prevent me from getting a press pass. That is similar to a license.

    That leaves speech. Now, we have pretty broad liberties when it comes to personal speech. We can say or write just about anything and hold about any opinion we want as long as its not injurious to the public. You can’t yell fire in a crowded movie theater and you can’t put up posters that claim your neighbor is a meth-addicted child molester who eats cats just because he broke your snowblower.

    Commercial speech, on the other hand, is highly regulated. The FCC can tell CBS that a character in a sitcom can’t say fuck on network TV or that a singer can’t flash her breasts during the Super Bowl. Someone mentioned prior restraint – that means that if the FCC knows CBS is going to say fuck on TV it can’t prohibit CBS from broadcasting the show. But it sure as hell can fine CBS after the fact. The FTC exists to review advertising and determine whether a company lied to the public. The FTC cannot file criminal charges, but it sure as hell can fine a company that lied to the public. Commercial speech is regulated like crazy.

    So, where does art fall. Since we can’t define art, the performing arts fall under the umbrella of protected speech. However, when speech intersects with the interests of the public or is done for a commercial purpose, the government has a right to regulate how the speech is delivered. That right has been upheld over and over again.

    Stripping is a great example. Stripping has been upheld by the Supreme Court as protected speech. A man or a woman has a constitutionally-protected right to take their clothes off to express a message. It’s in the law. You can look it up.

    The government is allowed to regulate where that stripping takes place. In most communities, a stripper couldn’t do her act on the town square at high noon while her suitcase pimp passed around the hat as if she was a folk singer.

    The government has a right to pass zoning laws that limit where adult entertainment businesses can be located. It can’t do that retroactively – that’s prior restraint. In other words, if I open a strip club next to a church, city council can’t retroactively pass a zoning law that prohibits locating a strip club next to a church. But it can do it proactively so that the next guy can’t do it.

    The government has a right to control the stripper’s message by restricting how much clothing he or she can remove during their performance or whether they must wear pasties and/or a G-string. And remember, the Supreme Court has said that jurisdictions can restrict the sale of pornography and sex toys in their communities if they want.

    Finally, the government has the right to license strippers – the right to regulate who can express their message in public by taking off their clothes.

    Making porn is no different than running a strip club in the eyes of the law.

    Now, someone will make the argument that a movie is different from stripping. The First Amendment does not – and government cannot – make a distinction that one form of protected speech deserves more protection than another form of protected speech. If that were the case, Rand Paul would have the right to stand on my town square and spew all kinds of stupid shit because he’s a US Senator, but the state could say I can’t say the exact same words because I’m an idiot.

    Similarly, the state cannot say that Stripper A can get a license because she’s got a great body and is a really good dancer but Stripper B can’t get a license because she’s old, ugly and pretty clumsy. Stripper A’s message is given the same level of protection as Stipper B.

    Protected speech is protected speech. Francis Ford Coppola gets the same protections as Bugs Bunny. At the same time, Francis Ford Coppola faces the same regulations as Bugs Bunny. He doesn’t get a pass on his sets because he’s a genius and the other guy is making a cartoon for kids.

    I have no idea whether the state of California or Los Angeles County has any interest in licensing porn talent. My theory has always been that porn gets a pass because it is distasteful. No professional wants to be on jizz patrol. So long as porn did its business behind closed doors and there were no dead bodies on the sets, no one wanted to know about it.

    Porn is getting the attention it is getting now because porn is pushing the envelope, people are getting hurt, and people are getting infected.

    California may end up with no interest in licensing porn, despite the sorry state of its finances. But as long as it doesn’t use the license as a way to regulate content, there’s no First Amendment reason why it can’t do so. In other words, the state can’t issue a license that says: Lisa Ann, you can give a blow job, but you can’t have vaginal sex based on this license. That’s content.

    Again, the First Amendment talk that was spouted by talent like James Deen sounds great and is fun to argue about. But, read the lawsuit filed by Vivid and read the judge’s decision. Porn made an economic argument. Not a First Amendment argument.

  100. @Laura –

    I honestly think some of us should get an “I survived Patricia for an entire year” award.

    It was an experience that could actually give you PTSD. And, then she (or her twin sister) shows up here and I’m thinking “this is just fucking wonderful.”

    Now, I’m going to have to work hard enough to earn the “I survived Kate” award. 🙂

    Please don’t take offense to this because I talked to so many different people from his blog over the last year, but did we ever talk or anything on there that you remember? Your name sounds familiar, but I can’t remember anything else? Either way, it’s nice to talk to you now! 🙂

    Shit, mharris and I talked on a few occasions over there and I didn’t even realize he was the same person on here until recently… hahaha! 🙂

  101. @BT –
    “A spirited discussion” would be an understatement.

    I’m waiting for Rob Black to show up and say “This whole thread is retarded.” 😉

  102. @BT –
    Nice job! Very well done and I learned a few things in the process!

    *Mike may actually want to consider making that a whole blog entry? Just a suggestion?*
    Very informative!! 🙂

  103. @BT
    Roflmao about mom likes wife’s best….

    Ty for the great explanation of the vivid case!
    they don’t define art under the first, the way attorneys use it is “freedom of creative expression that is” speech is expression (Fried brain right now)

  104. @kate
    Pointing out that I think Nick’s book is a little out there isn’t really an attack. It is what happens in the real world when people see a published work that is being peddled at them with a premise based on angels and ying yangs. Nick can prove me wrong by providing me with a copy of the Orion Compass which is available in eBook form on Amazon for 4.99. I’m sure it will be more compelling than a Nancy Drew novel.

    I have nothing against Nick. He advertised the book and I responded with my opinion. Throughout the years I’ve learned that those relying on fictitious beings for guidance may not provide the most solid advice. How do you know I’m not his guardian angel and feeling remorse for the advice I provided him years back when I was inebriated? Those could have been dark periods for the both of us.

    I’m unaware of a tallying system that would provide me the information needed to determine if I’m Rob’s #1 fan. He provides me entertainment at work and I think he’s doing more than others to help the business. As jilted said there are tactics that he can use which would provide greater acceptance, but his show is more entertaining than any other person in adult with a radio show. I think he has a plan and I wouldn’t underestimate him just yet. He comes across as someone that would stop at nothing to have the last laugh. Those are the ones you have to watch out for.

  105. LurkingReader, you have to know my Mom to understand that. Back in the day, she was the head of the clerical and accounting staff for my Dad’s company. She had one gal who was really great looking. My older brother came home from college, went into the office, flirted and asked her out. After he left, my mother told the secretary that my brother was a jerk and she should steer clear of him.

    Brother was pretty upset – hey, you’re my mom. To which my mom said: Yeah, but I have to work with her after you break her heart.

  106. OUTSTANDING BT…really well written 😉 Thank You, and FWIW my mother is to this day best friends with my ex wife….the first one that I divorced in 1982….so i DO understand that one.

  107. @Laura: Conspiracy theorist? Not a coincidence? Let me take a cue from Mike himself and say … PROVE IT!!! HA! I didn’t think I’d get to use that gem any time soon!!! And don’t you, Lacey, AND sacertorte ALL post on Deen’s blog? Cheering him on like idiots? First off, how can you buy into his ‘never caught an std’ bullshit?
    Let me tell you a story… Ricky Nelson was a struggling musician and his father (look it up) actually PAID girls to rush the stage, crying and fainting and ACTING like they really liked him!!!! Now, in the internet age, it’s even easier for a publicist to create a buzz around a particular person because nobody even needs to see them at all!!! Just faceless anonymous trolls who have an agenda BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING PAID!!!!!
    And here you are bullying Kate and me and ANYONE ELSE who doesn’t tow the company bullshit line of… We’re fine!!! WE don’t catch std’s!!! WE don’t need government intervention!!!! Girls dig James!!! lol!!! Gay men love James because they know they have a chance if they have enough money! The gay guy who made “The Canyons” even took him to dinner!!!! So, Laura? Let me ask you a question… Do you think it’s actually possible that James Deen has never caught an STD? Could you really be that stupid? None of the other performers (myself included) will believe that LIE in a million years! And Laura, for all we know you are a bloated man who eats cheetos by his computer at all hours of the day living in his mothers basement! That is the problem with this anonymity thing! I understand anonymity as long as you are not bullying people (like you do with Kate), but when you cross that line, step out from the shadows and let us see who you are or you are a punk ass bitch!!!
    Now’s where you say, “NO, look on Jame’s blog!!!! She was HORRIBLE!! Why won’t anyone believe me? Just go there and look!!!
    Well, honey, I wouldn’t visit James “Hazmat suit wearing std infested asshat” Deen’s site if you paid me!!! And I see you ‘girls’ bullying her for no reason at all except that she brings up good points that you all are trying desperately to sweep under the rug. Now I gotta go, because unlike you bullies, I have a life and nobody pays me to sit around looking at your fifth grade schoolyard rants all day! B’bye!!!

  108. @CPan: I am not friends with Rob. He and I’ve only met once. And your name is Rachel, right!? Sure it is, sure it is! Oh, and I didn’t advertise my book in here and nobody even mentions it when they talk about porn stars who’ve written books. SATAN advertised my book here by posting that video to try to discredit me, and when it didn’t get the response he wanted, you became Satan’s little helper by REPOSTING the same damned video and then YOU accused me of advertising my book here! You and your butt buddy SATAN did that for me! Oh, the spins on the truth you like to place in front of casual readers so they think things that just are not true!!! Like you being a girl named Rachel, lol!!! And I’ll tell you another thing, that book is the first of a trilogy (that means three books in total) that gets wilder and wilder with each turning page, and I’m PROUD of my work!!! Now show us the books you’ve had on the Best seller list and I’ll accept your review of a book you haven’t even read, and wonder if you believe Jesus came back from the dead after three days in a cave, okay? Because ANYONE who believes in the resurrection believe MUCH more crazy batshit than I ever will!! Come to think of it, Rachel? Do you believe in God? Or do you think you are a god like a good satanist should, eh?

  109. @Lurking: If you bully somebody behind a wall of anonymity, you are a punk ass bitch!!! Simple as that!!! And you are a coward too scared to show yourself to the people you bully! I’ve never met Kate, and I ask her to not return the bullying the fifth graders like to dish out at her, but she can do as she pleases, as I’m not her keeper. I would like to implore Mike South to make obvious bullies either come out of the bushes and show us who they REALLY are, or delete their accounts! And why in God’s Green Earth would a midwest homemaker give two shits about what goes on in the industry? I am from the midwest, and the housewives there are much too interested in their FAMILIES to post here incessantly, so stop making them look bad, please!!!

  110. Nick: You’re Awesome!
    These losers are hilarious! lol
    continue on desperate for attention losers! haha.
    The people of the blog are waiting for more of your intellectual commentary! Lacey .. Sachertorte …Sache? where are you? we miss you! 🙁 and of Course Laura! CONTINUE ON… PLEASE NEVER LEAVE?
    The people in the industry LOVE you guys! #fact

  111. I think the people on Mikes blog should get an ” I survived Lacey, Sachertorte and Laura’s schoolyard bullying desperate for attention bullshit pathetic losers award!

    I heard James Deen already placed his order! 🙂

    And if you really are married lacey…. my sympathies to your husband!

  112. LOL. PLEASE NEVER LEAVE LAURA!
    The people in the industry NEED you…
    They are riveted to your every comment! lol

    and why is it that bullies like lacey who have bipolar disorder… and who is accusing me of being like 10 different people are calling me CRAZY? lol

    Continue on!!

    Nick? Laura thinks you’re confused? lol

  113. LOL. Yeah Laura… the people on here really are interested in your opinion because you have so much to say… OH WAIT..
    You rarely comment on here… You only appear when drama ensues and to bully and attack me… And you’re also buddies with “Lacey”

    That’s what I LOVE about bullies like you.. YOU”RE A BUNCH OF COWARDS! That’s why you attack and bully in groups.
    You’re pathetic.. but laughable! PLEASE NEVER LEAVE!

    ” Lacey is obviously very interested and educated on these topics and many others on here that aren’t performers or in the industry”
    LOL. How much did lacey have to pay you to make this statement?

  114. Nick? you are absolutely correct! I saw James Deen on Pamela Peaks Website. Looks like James “never tell a lie” Deen…. Is/was escorting.

    ” and your “proof” that Kate is Patricia is ludicrous at best”

    LOL. No kidding Nick. I’m NOT this “Patricia”. These bullies are more then ludicrous.. they’re PATHETIC! Remember, Lacey is also accusing me of posting on numerous blogs under different names! LOL

    She can tell because of my crazy writing! LOL might have to up the meds!

    It appears Lacey and the gang must be bullying other people on other sites as well.
    My name is Kate believe it or not! I NEVER commented on James Deen’s blog. BELIEVE IT OR NOT! …And you losers are making total asses out of yourselves and I LOVE every minute of it!
    You don’t bother me at all! LOL

    CONTINUE ON!

  115. LOL CPAN! Thanks for outing yourself!
    You didn’t attack Nick? LOL
    I have nothing against nick? LOL

    And you still haven’t said who this one person who knows you on this blog is? “RACHEL” LOL

    And you attacked Nick… in your response to jilted.. in regards to Rob Black.
    hmmm
    and your opinion CPAN has no value …PERIOD.

    YOU ARE SOOOO FULL OF SHIT! LOL

  116. This whole thread is retarded alright lacey. Thanks to desperate for attention bullies like YOU! 😉

  117. Here thing laura Lacy has use her opion state that here opion what porn indusrty listen to. Yet she offer no proof that here opion is what porn indusrty listen to. She all,s one those claim no listening Rob Black opion yet there creditable fact he part indusrty like or not where Lacy does have same creditable . All have state laura great Lacy has opion does give her any more power change what going in porn indusrty becuase not part indusrty she can only offer up her opion. When some who part indusrty can do more than just give there opion I put far more stock on that than Lacy opion.

  118. I think the people on mikes blog should also get an “I survived Lacey, Sachertorte and Laura’s schoolyard bullying desperate for attention bullshit pathetic losers t shirt.

    I heard James Deen already placed his order for this as well! 🙂

    James has to pay for his award and t shirt because he doesn’t comment on mikes blog.. so the award and t shirt have to be special made just for him. apparently James said it’s worth every penny! 😉

    Again, my sympathies to your husband , if you are indeed married ,Lacey!

  119. Well I think I said everything I needed to say to Lacey and her follow bullies on this post so I am moving on! If these bullies want to continue attacking and harassing Nick East and Me… That’s up to YOU!
    But we’re NOT leaving! And your tactics are laughable! lol

  120. @BT…..wow you really have a way of explaining things!…thanks for that really informative post on first amendment rights, free speech & art and how it related to vivid, condoms, licenses etc… I really learned a lot….. so is mandatory condoms also argued against under the protection of content?
    @Lacey….Its nice to communicate with on here as well:)…I went under the name of Laura b. and only made a few posts on his site…a couple pro condom comments and a mention about previous hiv cases after 2004…..and one comment stating that Patricia scares me (lol) and the brutal attacks on stoya were inappropriate considering the venue …..I did read and enjoy your postings there as I do here as well.
    @Nick…. to address your question….I really don’t know what to believe when it comes to Deen stating he’s never had an STD…it seems very unlikely to me, from what I read stds are very common amongst performers, so I have no idea how he would have escaped getting even one…. If condoms were always used I would more likely believe it, but we know that’s not the case (though he does state that he always uses condoms outside the testing industry in his personal life)…..I worked for Planned Parenthood for many years so I have a good working knowledge about how easily STDs can be spread…. why he would feel compelled to put out false information, if it is indeed false, is something I find perplexing and wonder the benefit…..he seems like a very forthcoming guy

  121. @Nick
    I think it is awesome that you are making it a trilogy. I’m proud of you for talking to angels and solving life problems. I’m sure those in Africa mining diamonds with only one arm would agree that things were extremely tough for you in life.

    @kate
    It is the internet. I could be Nick East plugging his book. I could be Jesus asking Nick to quit praying to me because I’ve stopped answering his prayers a long time ago. It doesn’t matter. I don’t really care who anyone here is. I could have four people using this account and it wouldn’t even matter. I could be using 3 accounts. The internet is not real. I don’t see why you would care. Should I feel flattered? I don’t care who you are. Should I? Are you important? I’m not. Who posts on an adult message board that is actually important? No one, really.

  122. What find amzase people change subject becuase they do not like it. So far only people off up opion on subject are ones not get effect buy it. Where are those porn indusrty people some claim come here speak there mind on this subjects??? If this was such important issue porn indusrty than why no from porn indusrty raise there voice give there opion on here?? Why that only people who seem care about issue are raise there opion in this issue are people does effect them??? This question keep come up so called porn sages here who no have no that been in part indusrty have no answers for why this so. They well change subject tell is Rob Black fault fun think so.

  123. @Nick….what the hell?….no one is bulling you…. using the terminology “punk as bitch” to a woman not bullying you makes you the bully!

  124. @laura

    I find Deens no std story impossible to buy….give us the stats lol isn’t it something like 1 in 6 Americans now have genital herpes?

  125. @Lurk…..yes 1 in 6 Americans between the age of 14-50 have genital herpes….an estimated 780,000 new infections a year….. it’s easier passed from an infected male to female then infected female to male….so 1 in 5 females have it and 1 in 9 males have it between that age group….

  126. @rawalex
    “Try to remember that, it’s very important. Material that is considered obscene or that is illegal does not come with the same protections.”

    You mean all porn, right? Any porno can be called obscene. You could show penises shooting confetti instead of semen and someone could say it was obscene. There is no way for you to know what is obscene and what isn’t until a jury tells you.

  127. @Lurk…..and what’s crazy is most people don’t know they have it, because they’ve never had an outbreak or they’ve had only one or two…..but there’s still a 10% chance of passing it to someone else under these conditions.

  128. @laura –
    Oh yeah, I actually DO remember you!!
    Once you wrote out “Laura b” I immediately recognized you. 🙂
    Haha.. I wonder if we are now considered “old” internet friends?

  129. @laura & @LurkingReader –
    I would bet a huge sum of money in Vegas on the fact that Deen has had multiple STD’s during his career.

    I mean, think about it, he’s had various kinds of sex with somewhere around 4,000 girls. 4 THOUSAND. He stated that estimate in an interview once a while ago…

    But, it’s his personal business and he can say whatever he wants. There’s no way to prove he’s lying without knowing his medical history and I can’t blame him for not releasing that information.. I wouldn’t.

    You also have to realize that he is one of the poster boys for the industry, so it wouldn’t look too good if he said in a TV interview “Oh yeah, I’ve a bunch of STD’s, but the industry is safe.” Meh.

  130. @Laura: What the Hell! Making fun of my spiritual beliefs ISN’T bullying me? Get real, anonymous fat guy living in his moms basement!!! And if you think for one second that just because someone on here CLAIMS to be a woman DOES NOT MAKE IT SO!!! If any of you want to bully me and make fun of me, don’t be cowards or punk ass bitches about it, come forward and let me know who you are!!! But, my favorite part is you saying that nobody here is bullying me!!!!! Just because an anonymous ‘woman’ says it’s true doesn’t make it so, eh ‘laura’? Saying that Kate is Patricia (don’t even know who that is or why it should matter and I’m not going to a gay prostitute’s blog to find out) is bullying her why? What did she do other than use common sense? Again, if you think James Deen HAS NEVER CAUGHT AN STD you are living in a fantasy land!!!! And I will tell you the reason he says that… It’s a lot easier to convince an uneducated girl that you’ve lived the straight (lol) and narrow by LYING about having never caught an STD!!! And you ‘girls’ comment on the loser’s blog, right? Tell him to come here and explain how it’s possible that he can do this job and

  131. @cpanzram: I would advise you to prove to me that you are a female AT ALL!!!! How about we exchange emails and you tell me your phone number and I will call you and we will talk over the phone!!! Or can you not find a girl who will actually act like she’s you? And I advise ANYBODY who believes a man died and then came back to life three days later that they are even more ‘batshit mental’ than I am!!! I have a REAL story WORTH telling and for you to advise me to toss it all away is absurd and downright EVIL!!! No wonder you side with SATAN!!! Now I will say quite concisely that YOU ARE EVIL!! Let me guess, are you in fact the most evil woman in porn? Are you Diane ‘Blood on her hands’ Duke?

  132. @Kate: cpanzram gave us this gem: ” I could have four people using this account and it wouldn’t even matter.” Please tell me you noticed that!!! They all interchange the alias they will use based on the ones previously used!!!! I picture about five people with a list of alias’s and the passwords all working towards the FSC goal of PROPAGANDA! The industry polices itself, we don’t have an STD problem, No on set transmission of ANY STD EVER!!!
    I shut Sachertorte up by asking her how many ON SET TRANSMISSIONS OF syphilis have occured thanks to Mr. Marcus and she hasn’t been heard from since!!! All the talent walking around with doctors notes (how many of them are there?) got SYPHILIS ON SET!!! So she went away because she didn’t want to press that particular issue because she was hoping NOBODY would notice that little tidbit of information!!!!
    So let me say it again… SYPHILIS WAS TRANSMITTED TO COUNTLESS TALENT ON SET!!! Come out, sache, come out wherever you are and tell us how HIV is a ‘manageable disease’ just like Lydia Lee did, k? And tell us all how the testing program WORKS!!!! And remind us all that the performers live in Lolipop land and only play with each other and how they NEVER catch STD’s (James Deen, I’m looking at you here, and by the way, very original stage name, eh?)! Tell us all how the government needs to get their noses out of OUR BEDROOMS (yup, Diane Duke ACTUALLY SAID THAT), and tell us all how many girls NOW want to be the next Jenna Jameson (not one anymore, eh)! Come on, Sache!!!! Or whoever decides to use that alias NEXT TIME!!! I will be waiting for you!!!!!

  133. Nick? I did notice that!
    Thanks CPAN for letting us know that you bullies and trolls all interchange the alias you will use based on the ones previously used! LOL
    Bullies and trolls are STUPID!

    By the way CPAN? You STILL haven’t told me who the one person is that knows who you are on this blog!

    And Nick? You know Sachertorte is reading our comments.
    I’m positive that bully is glued to our every word.
    All these bullies know each other… Lacey… Sachertorte…Laura.. etc..

    I think we need to change James Deen’s name.
    How about Marvin Doolittle?

  134. @Nick

    You caught me. I am Satan. I am the holy trinity that is known as the FSC. Satan has a holy trinity too. The Catholics were correct as far as the trinities we are allowed. Yeah, there is more than 3 in the FSC overall, but only 3 matter. Joe was using the account, but we don’t really like him. Do you think I created Lady Gaga to entertain fans? I scoff at you, my friend!!!!! That was merely done in order to provide acceptance towards crossover performers. Back before the internet when we used to pass messages on slabs of bone we all knew that the true judgement on getting into heaven was the T-Cell count.

    Jesus wasn’t your messiah, Nick. It was this guy Davey. He was weird. I think he let the fame go to his head. He was killed in Waco or something. That was your boy.

    As for your guardian angel, we all took parts in giving you false information. It was like a game. I’m really sorry about that. I was really angry at the time and decided to take my anger out on you. When I asked you to draw the S on the paper I think I was asking for you to draw me a map home. I was really messed up on PCP.

    I’m sorry.

    @Patty
    Your companionship with Nick reminds me of Spritle and Chim Chim or Jabba and Salacious Crumb.

  135. Oh CPAN.. Who is the one person on the blog that knows you?
    Why do you refuse to answer that question… “RACHEL”? LOL
    And your bullying and insults just never end..do they “Rachel”?

    And you don’t have anything against Nick. lol
    CPAN? Your insults and bullying hurt my feelings. 🙁

    You are good for a chuckle! LOL

  136. I well tell why they do not answer your questions Kat there not part porn indusrty . So they can only take make opions they get off Mike blog Rob rants adultfyi. When question them about matter that there only limited to other people opions that are in porn indusrty they not come up with answer your question becuase they do know what talking about. Prove my point all porn sage offer up so called advice where your proof that you are in porn indusrty??? Where your proof that live where this is take place??? Where your proof this had any thing do with you at all??? Where proof you have been in porn indusrty under stand what this means to it??? Where proof than any one porn indusrty other tham Mike South cares what your opion is??? Where your proof that any one in porn give more than two figs about this issue othe Nick East few others??? Where your proof that know what your talking about???

  137. @nick

    I haven’t earned a paycheck in 23 years…my family pays me in lots of love and support though:) it’s called being a Volunteer

  138. @Lacey……yes it does seem highly unlikely that he wouldn’t have caught something with numbers like that….. And true I wouldnt name off my stds to the world either….. But I just wouldnt answer the question…..he seems like the type that would have a hard time being untruthful…you know?……but I get your point about the industry and such…..ive read interviews with performs that claim to have picked up several stds within the first few months or so.

  139. Richard, Nick, Kate … (and others who think only porners’ opinions matter, and/or everyone should identify themselves).

    First of all, of the three of you, only Nick (trust me,I talk to angels) East actually identifies himself. Kate and Richard scream about people hiding behind fake names while doing so yourself. WTF?

    Second: I proved a while back that being honest and identifying myself (as a nobody, actually) was futile. I was blasted and accused of being an FSC troll, and several different industry insiders. Nick even stated he had proof that I was in CA, masking my IP (for the record, he also threatened to leave the blog if Mike didn’t ban me, what happened there, Nick?)

    Finally, and most importantly… You guys who are actually deep inside the porn industry might want to pay some attention to what outsiders think. Don’t know if you realize it or not but “the industry” is no longer making it’s own decisions. The various city, county, and state governments are taking that decision process away from the industry. Screaming your opinions as fact, calling people names, spouting outlandish conspiracy theories about paying trolls, to try and win internet pissing contests on a porn blog isn’t going to change that.

    The reason I name the three of you specifically is simple. I’ve been reading and commenting on this blog for at least five years, maybe more. I’ve never seen the kind of bullshit you bring to the table. I enjoy reading most of the posts and comments. Whether I necessarily agree or not, there’s almost always something I can glean from the discussion. With you three, it always degrades to the same tactics… anyone who disagrees with you must prove who they are, or they’re obviously some troll hired by the FSC or the devil or whoever. Do you really think that much of yourselves? Why would anyone pay good money to have someone discredit you, when you all do it so well yourselves?

    Just my thoughts, I’m going back to work, feel free to flame me all you want.

  140. Laura: To your question about mandatory condoms and freedom of speech, that is a position that porn has taken on websites and in press statements. However, that was not the central argument porn lawyers made in the Vivid lawsuit challenging the law. It was in there, but it wasn’t the heart of their suit. And, the judge dismissed that out of hand saying that they were unlikely to win on First Amendment grounds. The central argument in the Vivid case was economic – producers and performers would lose money because the consumer doesn’t want to watch porn with condoms. The judge rejected that argument as well in upholding the law. Vivid has appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals. This is considered the most liberal federal appeals court in the country, so it is the venue where they are most likely to have success. On the other hand, if they lose at the 9th Circuit – or if the 9th Circuit simply bounces it back to the original court for another look – they’ll be in tough shape. To win on appeal, you can’t just say that the original judge was wrong or that you don’t like his decision. You have to demonstrate that he was wrong under the law. So, if you read Vivid’s appeal, you’ll see that there’s a lot of discussion around First Amendment issues like prior restraint. However, the heart of their appeals argument is that the judge was wrong in how he interpreted the condom law – they accuse him of essentially rewriting the law so that it is constitutionally valid. In other words, they say he over-stepped his legal authority. The way they use prior restraint is not the way the James Deens of the world use it. Publicly, porn has said that requiring them to use condoms forces them to change their message – watching sex with condoms sends a different message than watching sex without condoms. Prior restraint means that the government can’t prevent you or I from saying something, writing something, publishing something or broadcasting something that may be objectionable or against the law. They can’t restrain us from exercising our First Amendment. Instead, they have to let us do what we want to do, then they can bring an action. You can’t say Fuck on network TV. So, let’s say the government gets wind that Max on Two Broke Gals is going to say she really wants to get fucked on next Tuesday’s episode. The government cannot go to CBS and say: We’ve heard this is what you’re planning to do. That violates the law, so we’re going to prevent you from broadcasting. That’s prior restraint. However, the government can come down with everything at its disposal against CBS after it broadcasts the objectionable scene. It just can’t restrain it prior to broadcast. That’s a First Amendment issue.

    What’s all that got to do with Vivid? The way they are using prior restraint is to say that the requirement of having people trained in blood-borne pathogens, forcing them to get permits and posting those permits during shoots will limit the number of shoots. Or, in the case of Kayden Kross, it will force her to stop the production of pornographic content because she shoots in her home which is in the affected area; she doesn’t want to use condoms; and she doesn’t have a budget to rent locations in an unaffected jurisdiction. It is restraining her from being a pornographer. Logan Pierce says that he will have fewer opportunities to act because there will be fewer shoots – thus you are restraining him from expressing himself on film.

    However, they aren’t really making a content-based argument. It’s a little odd.

    Here’s the link. http://howappealing.law.com/VividEnt_9th_Cir_opening_brief.pdf

  141. hunter. i am not interested in the opinion of someone who harassed and bullied me ,nick and richard for 2 or 3 days.

    and i am not saying that EVERYONE has to identify themselves. only the ones who come on here and harass and bully people.ike me…. ya know… lacey, laura, sache cpan etc

    and i know you do not like nick east. hunter
    unless you know what you are talking about keep your opinion to yourself.
    i know you are mikes friend.. but that does not give you the right to come on here and spread your bullshit.

  142. and hunter… by just making that smart ass remark about nick and angels you just attacked him again…. i rest my case.

    and hunter… my name is kate.
    and hunter.. richards name is richard.

    and we do not harass and bully people.
    we are defending ourselves against people who hide behind fake names bullying us.
    thats why they bully hunter… they ARE the ones who need to identify themselves.

    oh and hunter… when you were harassing and bullying richard for 3 hours you called him lacka.. or whatever..

    how funny that a bully like you …who never even said you were sorry. would come on here to defend other bullies. lol

  143. oh and hunter… when YOU were harassing and bullying nick and me… you deliberately acted in a way to make him believe you were in the industry. i told you from the very start that i DID NOT care if you were in the industry or not… i knew you were a troll bullying us…

    so cut the crap hunter… the only thing you proved is that you are an ass. just like you are now with your comment.
    and i know you want nick to leave…but he is NOT…SORRY HUNTER.
    And for the record …nick is a really nice guy… and i am getting tired of people like you making fun of him… who are you to judge him…

  144. Here my thing Hunter your some othere people keep claim opions matter more than other people opions do here on porn indusrty. Yet have establish why who or what your are porn indusrty makes your opion matter so much more any one who establish they been in porn indusrty. Infact when question about that Hunter your freinds you all get very defensive about subject. Buy way Hunter have right question some one opion claim to expert on subject to know what make expert on that subject. What gives them right tell other people there opion is wrong. Other than fact there freinds with Mike South. Real so not care if friends with Mike South does proof nothing me that expert on subject or effects you just means friend Mike South. So again have opions come from people that not effect buy this who are not in porn indusrty getting up set over this matter well most real porn indusrty could care less about this issue. So far those are real facts all other bull shit side show. Any one in porn indusrty who has proof that prove wrong has balls come here say them self ready welcome read your opion. All other people opion matter your self in your owen mind quite try fool self in think real porn indusrty care what think just not ture.

  145. so hunter… to sum up….
    THE PEOPLE WHO COME ON HERE TO HARASS AND BULLY PEOPLE LIKE ME, NICK AND RICHARD…
    YA KNOW … LACEY… SACHE…. LAURA…. CPAN… ETC.
    ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO IDENIFY THEMSELVES….
    IT EASY TO BULLY NICK EAST… PEOPLE KNOW WHO HE IS…YOU UNDERSTAND THAT .. RIGHT HUNTER?
    BUT THE ONES WHO BULLY AND ATTACK HIM… ARE HIDING BEHIND FAKE NAMES BECAUSE THEY ARE COWARDS… THATS WHY THEY BULLY…

    GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT HUNTER. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SOMEONES OPINION….
    STOP SPREADING YOUR BULLSHIT.

  146. OH AND HUNTER?
    THE REASON THAT PEOPLE IN THE INDUSTRY ATTACK NICK..
    IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH.. WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT .
    SO THEY COME ON HERE …HIDE BEHIND FAKE NAMES AND ATTACK HIS CHARACTER…. HOPING THAT NO ONE WILL PAY ATTENTION TO HIM AND HE WILL GO AWAY..
    YOU GET THAT..RIGHT HUNTER?

    I AM NOT SAYING ALL THE PEOPLE WHO COME ON HERE TO BULLY PEOPLE ARE ALL IN THE INDUSTRY…
    SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST PATHETIC AND THEY WANT ATTENTION… BUT YOU CANNOT DENY THAT SOME OF THEM ARE IN THE INDUSTRY… YA KNOW THAT RIGHT HUNTER?
    WOW. YOU ARE UNBELIVEABLE.

  147. Here issue your agrument Hunter. All outside thing that effecting porn indusrty that happening porn indusrty take place does make you expert on subject. Becuase does effect you becuase only effect those people in porn indusrty. Are gone be one pay be license porn star are gone be made wear condoms in porn movie are gone be get STD test are gone doing thing in porn movies Hunter???? Does any shit effet any body outside porn indusrty who give there opion how much go effect them short answer is no. So Hunter your agrument goes right up flames.

  148. Hunter gone use some thing Lacy told me if do not like my comment than piss off go read some else comment. Porn indusrty clearly not care about comments from people on subjects that does effet them. They proven that not respond here this subject at all to people post there opions on here.

  149. oh toby… hunters post is spot on? lol
    you rarely comment but when you do …you come on here to make this ridiculous statement? LOL I tip my hat to you sir… for being ignorant.
    and for agreeing with a bully.

  150. @bt……okay I hear what your saying…..so with prior restraint you have the freedom to plan and actually commit an offense but then after doing so may suffer the consequences……and vivids argument under appeal doesnt focus on condoms as being a content restriction but instead a limiting of resourse that prevents following the law that will then effect the opportunities to express freedom of speech…..interesting angle…..im supprised content isnt more the focus….thanks for the clarification on this….. You are my go too guy:)

  151. “There is alot he isnt saying. I think he knows more than most in rergards to this.”
    Were you talking about Rob or me? If you were talking about me you’re absolutely corrrect.
    Cpan, look at Mikes article on Jan 28 or 29 of this year, the one written about IzzyHall and AHF two weeks before their press conference annoucing AB332. I wrote it.

  152. Jilted your right beyond pathetic argument being made on issue being made buy people does even effect them. Those get up set buy that not any from porn indusrty but those who opions mean nothing to those who are effect on issue. Toby care explain where hunter spot becuase so far from spot on laugh able. I well raise same question gave hunter are you porn star are gone have put on condom do porn movie buy license be in porn trust health STD test??? Can you prove your some one in porn indusrty that thinks you opion matter to them??? Can show you done more than leave opion here at Mike Souths. All hunter prove is thinks his opion worth more than all othere people opion becuase friend Mike South. All hunter prove is think opion worth more than any one been in porn indusrty that he not part of that admits him self. All hunter prove is that do not care what opion on porn indusrty becuase not part indusrty opion care no vale any one it . Only proof that hunter provide is fact that he so. Sorry if well not take word for. I have hard take people at word special when offer up no fact that there opion mean any thing issue. So far so called wise sage porn have give enough proof that there opion effect any thing happing in porn indusrty. The have prove alot of them not part indusrty they have no what talk about. WTF fact day is Hunter why issue only effects porn stars has ever body not porn star or porn indusrty talk like going effect them??? So untill some one from porn indusrty that is retire or no longer in can show they care about issue I could care less about opions come from peanut gallery from people that have no clue what goes on porn indusrty.

  153. Hey Kate let issue go just for reason becuase so call self preclaim wise sage porn here can not say how this gone effect them. They can go make there lame exuses spins why there opions matter well indusrty ignore them goes on doing what all been doing. I have made point I see no from porn indusrty who effects gone make point here so not gone waste my time make point bunch people does effect in hope find some one it does effect. I do thank Nick East and you Kate for your support.

  154. Seriously…what are you all even talking about??? Bullying, trolls, ect? These post are beyond annoying!! Get back to some actual points and discussion!

  155. @Nick
    I have a life Nick. It is a life where I don’t have to talk to angels and write books about it. I noticed you got another review on your amazon listing by people who have only reviewed that book. That’s credible, right?

    That was the first time I called Kate Patricia.

    @kate

  156. @jilted
    Not saying Rob knows more in regards to legislation than you or even legal matters.

    Why would they want to talk to him though? There are so many others they could have discussed things with. Then, the question of why they would want to talk to a convicted felon. Well, they did. Why? I think Rob is smarter than knowing about legislation that could be passed and thinking he can waltz in, set up shop, and control it. I think he may be tied to it. Not the writing of it or the idea of it, but part of the aftermath. Let’s be honest. That is where the money would lie. There is the incentive.

    He either has something up his sleeve or has something waiting for him that he knows of. That’s just my view of it.

  157. @Jilted…couldn’t agree more..having a block party hoped to show a few people some insider opinions…especially yours, BT and RAW…instead
    Two people just handed iPad back and said…ugh we just sent the kids down to Mary’s…gonna move onto the strong booze now 🙂

  158. @kate
    “we are defending ourselves against people who hide behind fake names bullying us.
    thats why they bully hunter… they ARE the ones who need to identify themselves.”

    Isn’t that something Rob would say? Hmmm. Carry on.

  159. Seriously knowing annoying have people have no clue what talking about acting like they do. It seriously annoying this people would take people been indusrty think there opion worth more than those have been in porn indusrty. It seriously annoying that those never been in porn indusrty come change subject than blame on those did change subject in frist place. Seriously annoying all people who are not porn indusrty are biggiest group cry babys when there opion are challenge. It annoying only people in porn indusrty who want talk about this issue do not belong in it. It annoying Lelu that this is case.

  160. It annoying porn indusrty people be told buy none porn indusrty people there opions are more important on there indusrty than there owen even after fact those people never work in porn indusrty. Think about your doing your job some stranger who never seen has no clue what you do on your job comes up to you tell how do your job bettter. Than find out no one at company work for knows who person is how he know your job why can tell you can do better than you. When ask person how he knows what knows about your job they tell well stay holiday inn made smart enough do job. Seriously how stupid you have been not take there advice on subject.of your job. Opions are like assholes there asshole out there who opions may be where listen to becuase they know what there talking about than have group assholes that think there shit does stink but stinks like shit try sell out it.

  161. You don’t know me, but I’m ignorant? You honestly don’t have enough information to make that conclusion, but since I don’t agree with you then I must be ignorant. That’s the exact same kind of bullshit that Hunter’s post was about. Please crawl back under your rock, and take your fellow haters with you.

  162. Your right Toby you do not give any one enough information let any know you are. I well crawl under my rock soon you climb back under slimy rock your hide with all people not part porn indusrty . Who are make point at some other blog Mike South blag page becuase they do not want any one question on porn indusrty from some people been porn indusrty,

  163. I’m starting to think that Nick, Kate and Richard are the ACTUAL FSC Trolls….trying to make ”pro condom in porn” people look like total NUTJOBS!!!!!

  164. Yes – they are really making an economic argument but calling it prior restraint. Again, in an appeal, you can’t just say you don’t like the judge’s decision or that you think the judge was a bonehead. You have to say that the judge was wrong under the law.

    I’m not privy to Vivid’s legal strategy, so I can only go by what I read. But, the judge dismissed the First Amendment argument out of hand. He said, unlikely to win a First Amendment argument. That gives Vivid an opening to say: Well, that’s just wrong. Producing porn in California has been held to be legal, protected speech. So, anything that restricts our ability to produce legally-protected speech is a prior restraint.

    Now, the judge found that under the new law, you can have all the pussy-pounding, ass slamming that you want as long as you’re wearing a rubber. He made no content-based decisions.

    As a result, Vivid isn’t making content-based arguments. They are not saying that making Lisa Ann take it in the butt with a condom is limiting her right to express anal sex the way she wants to or that it’s going to dry up the market for creampie videos. That would be a content-based argument.

    I think there’s a good reason for that, too. The courts have consistently found that obscene material is unconstitutional. The court has been reluctant to define obscenity beyond child pornography, bestiality and excrement.

    This is a case that could go all the way to the Supreme Court, especially if the state wins this appeal. I believe that Vivid, like Larry Flynt, will argue this all the way to the Supreme Court.

    We have a pretty conservative Supreme Court. At least two members are openly hostile to pornography – Scalia and Thomas. Two more members are very conservative. Kennedy is a swing vote. If you’re Vivid, do you want to swing for the fences and throw the dice on whether one of the other five wouldn’t find the most disturbing acts on film unconstitutional, especially when those most extreme acts may also be the best examples of why you need condoms? Remember that in a Supreme Court argument, you can get briefs from friends of the court in support of one side or the other. There are any number of very smart, very well-funded anti-pornography groups that would love to argue that Kink.com, or the double-anal pounding taken by Julia Ann, or the 50 man anal cream pie are obscene and unconstitutional.

    So, instead, they’ve made this a restraint based appeal. In fact, Vivid tries to dismiss the public health argument pretty quickly. It argues that the industry has a stellar testing system, a fantastic public health record, and even if talent is a swimming cesspool of disease, you can get around the condom requirement by setting up shop in a neighboring county, so you’re not protecting the public health.

    That brings them back to prior restraint. Government is not allowed to pass a law that abridges – restrains – the right to speech. If you pass a law that restrains people’s abilities to express themselves sexually because the law kills the market for that speech, you’ve restrained speech.

    I’m not saying I agree with that. Only that if you read their papers and boil down the mumbo jumbo, that’s their argument. Kayden Kross’s argument is that she lives and works within the jurisdiction covered by the law. Her livelihood depends on her ability to film scenes in her home and post them on the Internet for her website members. She has no money in her budget to rent a location in a jurisdiction not covered by the law. If you force her to abide by this restriction, she will go out of business because she does not make enough money to rent a location.

    Logan Pierce argues that he expresses himself by performing in porn. If you enforce this law, there will be fewer opportunities to perform – for instance, his good friend Kayden won’t use him because she’ll shut down her website. So, you’re restraining his right to expression.

    Vivid’s best chance of winning is in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. It is the court most receptive to these kinds of arguments. That’s the good news.

    The bad news is that the 9th Circuit is over-turned by the Supreme Court more often than any other appeals court. The other bad news is that if Vivid loses in the 9th Circuit, its chances of winning on a Supreme Court appeal are slim to none. If you can’t win a First Amendment porn argument in front of a group of bleeding heart liberals, do you think you’re going to win in front of a group of guys who look like medieval executioners?

  165. @Bt
    Didn’t Kross argument also have to do with privacy of the domicile? Heard that come up last night in the boozy haze before neighbors got arrested for d/d when he thought it would be a good idea to try wireless projector against side of house …yeah it was porn and I now know what Deen looks like in all his glory lol. ..anyway before attorney Bob went to bail out the drunken fool he was detailing the rights of private homeowners (to about 6 cops and 200 peoples amusement we now know they don’t extend to showing movies against house…and folks won’t let me live this one down anytime soon:) but what I took away was it would encourage government to enter homes looking for condom use if a camera was being used with presumption that it was a production. Lots of good fun & debate at any rate.

  166. @ Mike – Laughing like crazy
    @ LurkingReader – I think the privacy issue was in the original lawsuit. It’s been a long time since I read it, but the one thing the judge ruled on in porn’s favor was that aspects of the law gave the government to much leeway to do inspections. It may still be in the appeal. If so, its buried near the end – and I didn’t make it all the way through. It’s not a primary argument.

  167. That funny Laura come from some one who no one in porn indusrty know who you are. I am start think no one from porn indusrty come here give there opion on subject. Why would they becuase people that there offering there opion who not work in porn indusrty think there opion means more than people have beed in porn indusrty go nuts when there told so. Laura you right porn troll have call for not being in porn have proven be nutjobs not part porn indusrty.

  168. Hunter think becuase he Mike best friend that get off tell other that he right there wrong. He not part porn indusrty so no expert on indusrty than any those people hide them self with fake name who claim there opion matter becuase not welling prove there any part porn indusrty. CPanzram all ask you what ask hunter what part of being made where condom effects you what part have get license effects you what part being std test effects you??? So far none people want answer those questions.

  169. @Mike…yes very interesting lol

    WTF is FARK.com? (I live a sheltered life lol and my gaybors wanted to out me in more ways than one last night…omg never drinking with Andrew again!) on the upside of down…it was fun before the denuded trees gave the rear subdivision a show they weren’t supposed to see.

    We had a lot of fun….they had phones out hooking into their firms databases pulling cases..and some guys came over today to check out what I had. Yes home privacy was an issue…it would be an invasion of a private residence even if a commercial production were being filmed.

  170. @richard, nick & kate..and others subjected to my post…… I apologize for my name calling outburst…a little too much wine on my part…. And yes richard im not in the the industry but still care about those that are…..

  171. @Laura
    cheering you on…before the apology 🙂 only wish I could send you a fresh glass of wine today 🙂

  172. @lacey & lurk…..awww thanks for the support you guys:)….I do feel like it took a lot to finally loose my cool….lol…..im much better at defending others then just throwing that kinda energy out …but I do wish I could take u up on that wine right now lurking…haha:)

  173. I was prescribed Zyban today to help me quit smoking….warning label says sever agitation may occur….so be fowarned:)

  174. Best of luck, Laura. You’ve made a great decision. Wife and I quit almost five months ago. Not only do we feel much better physically, food tastes better, and smells are more pronounced, but for me at least, there is a great sense of liberation in not being controlled by the habit. Congratulations in advance, let us know how it goes.

  175. Rob Black is finally starting to see the folly of his ways. Yesterday he said, “Take everybody following Rob Black out. We know nobody is going to go on the record and say “I follow Rob Black.”
    Rob has painted himself into a corner, and now there is nowhere to go. You cant be leader unles people will back you, and even Rob knows that nobody is going to follow him.
    But he still doesnt fully get it. He continues to spout that he is the only one addressing these issues, and taking credit for things he had nothing to do with.
    Rob could have made a real difference, but he thinks that he is more important than the issues at hand. He has the mistaken notion that talk is equal to action. How can Rob seriously try to convince people that he should be the industry leader, the head of UAWA, when he knows nobody will follow him?

    Rob, you arent more important than the issues. Maybe you dont realize that you make it seem that it is more important that Rob Black is talking, than what he is talking about.

  176. Thank you lacey:)… im gonna need all the luck I can get…..apparently this medicine is going to diminish the desire to smoke considerably….or at least it works that way for some people….sure hope im one of them.

Leave a Reply