MHarris Asks: If you were to gain ownership of AIM and Talent Testing Service, what would you do to improve them (besides fire “Dr.” Mitchell)?
Hey who said you could ask rhetorical questions….OK yer right putting Mitch out to pasture would be high on the list.
In all honesty at this point the whole argument may be moot, with OSHA looking to get in on it AIM could become superfluous.
But lets assume this is retro active, to maybe a few years ago.
First of all I think getting rid of the name AIM would be necessary, it conjures up the wrong image, at least for me. I’d like to start fresh with something that doesn’t bring up images of ineptitude.
Next on the to do list would be to install a board of health care professionals, real doctors, at least one should be an epidemiologist and one a public health specialist both should for sure specialize in STDs. The practices and procedures of the new organization would come from this board. The mission of this organization would be to make the adult industry a safer workplace while at the same time providing data from a study group that should help to make this organization the worlds foremost authority on sexually transmitted diseases. I would look for funding of this group from the people who would gain from access to this data.
AIM could have been something great that the industry contributed to the world, instead of a joke….
2 Responses
[New Post] Ask Mike South Question 8 – via @twitoaster http://www.mikesouth.com/uncategorized/a…
Thank you for answering my question. I do have one more question, though. With the current regulatory and testing environment, how do you verify that the models you are fucking/filming on screen don’t have AIDS? Do you use Talent Testing or AIM’s services (even though the system is a sick joke), or do you have some other manner of verification? If you use some other manner of verification of AIDS negativity, what test do you use (PCR/DNA, Western Blot/ELISA, or some other test)? Again, thank you for your time and education.