The truth about dog porn is unraveling. Porn Star files $5 Million defamation suit against defamers

Adult superstar Emily Willis files a defamation suit against her competitors’ dog-sex video tweets, according to her attorney and public records.

On this Blog’s Twitter account,  we have stated many times, The adult superstar and AVN performer of the year Emily Willis was being defamed by multiple Twitter and social media accounts, Long before Giana and many social media accounts commented about the many years of rumors.

Emily was not in any Videos being discussed

To be quite frank and honest here, there ought to be far more than just two people named in the complaint as defendants . After all one of the two who are named, seemingly that defendant were just echoing concerns about an already circulating rumor, and her concern of other performers who would, or have come in contact with the several who are “rumored” to have been in despicable and grotesque acts with a dog, or possible at least two dogs.

Emily is completely innocent. We have also stated that in the past as well, dog videos exist. However non includes Emily, some videos were leaked. It is not right that from jealousy, hatred, revenge, and opportunity were a catalyst to target this person. We applaud her and hope for the best outcome for this performer of renown accomplishments. there are some names and content already on tube sites and posts such as “Reddit” where a few performers can be easily identified.

When AVN performer of the year Emily Willis, an adult film actress, claims that she was defamed by inferior brand name adult actresses through false social media posts implying that she was one of the participants in a video depicting dogs having sexual relations, she is suing them for defamation.

What is seemingly missing from the complaint is the person who orchestrated the alleged videos, and who disseminated the rumors. Dianna Dior and Rae may have been commenting on the already rumor mill gossip on social media.

Emily Willis’ Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit against Gianna Dior and “A Rae”, which was filed on Tuesday, seeks more than $5 million in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages from the two designers. The representatives for Gianna Dior,  and Rae, could not be located or reached at the time of publication.

In the lawsuit, the defendants’ “lies” are described as “direct attacks on the plaintiff’s ability to earn a livelihood.” Members of the adult entertainment industry are heavy users of Twitter, which they use to communicate both amongst themselves and with the general public,”

Emily Willis is one of the most well-known performers in the adult film industry, and she has received numerous accolades, including the AVN Female Performer of the Year award. Emily Willis has won a number of other significant awards from a variety of different award platforms.

The most coveted award is the AVN Performer of the Year award, which Willis received without controversy, despite the fact that it was widely expected that she would win.

According to the lawsuit, Emily has approximately 1.7 million Instagram followers and counting along with 723,000 Twitter followers and rapidly growing, whereas Dior and Rae have approximately 414,000 and 168,000 questionable organic followers, respectively, on Instagram and Twitter.

Many years in the past, that videos of several women, rumored to be twelve to fourteen, engaging in sexual acts with two dogs, owned by the same owner began making their way around the adult entertainment industry,

It is alleged in the lawsuit that there was a considerable amount of rumors, speculation, and innuendo about the identities of the performers, within the entertainment industry, including but not limited to social media. A scandal had broken out, and it was particularly salient, with the obvious and intended potential to derail careers of a few successful adult performers, most were not named in the complaint.

According to the lawsuit, Dior and Rae each tweeted the false accusation that Willis was a participant in the video.

“By doing so, they made their lies available to the general public as well as to the entire community of plaintiff’s potential employers and co-workers,” the lawsuit claims in part.

A screenshot of a tweet by Willis, in which the plaintiff insulted an unidentified individual, was included in Dior’s initial tweet, according to the lawsuit.

As a result of Willis’ insult, Dior “apparently assumed it was directed at her” and “published her lie about the dog video in response,” according to the lawsuit.

According to the lawsuit, when other adult performers expressed their dissatisfaction with Dior and others who were spreading rumors about the dog video on Twitter, Dior responded by doubling down on her accusations.

According to the lawsuit, Rae changed her Twitter display name to express in a vulgar manner that having sexual relations with dogs is not appropriate.

“In short, she accused (Willis) of being a participant in the dog video and attempted to garner as much attention as she could around the accusation,” the lawsuit claims.

According to the lawsuit, Willis has received phone calls from a number of producers and others in the industry who have inquired as to whether she appeared in the dog video. While she may suffer financial consequences as a result of her prominence in the industry, Rae and Dior “had much to gain” by associating themselves with the plaintiff, according to the lawsuit.

Aside from the obvious economic harm, the lawsuit claims that the incident was “extremely embarrassing and distressing.” “But, even worse, she may never have the opportunity to fully clear her name in the eyes of a large number of others in the industry and the general public.”

We will be following this case closely.

 

705274cookie-checkThe truth about dog porn is unraveling. Porn Star files $5 Million defamation suit against defamers

The truth about dog porn is unraveling. Porn Star files $5 Million defamation suit against defamers

Share This

6 Responses

  1. You know the names of some of if not all the parties who participated in the video. And for some fucked up reason, you won’t dime them out.

  2. Who is the anonymous “we” in all this scree? Might one of them perhaps help you to write better and not sound like a blathering fool? Seriously, the most famous of authors take the advice of editors.

  3. I would like to know who took dog noses up their coochies, too. However, a reporter doesn’t dare give names in this situation unless he is God damn sure about their accuracy. Even then, a reporter better have his errors and omissions policy premiums up to date because as is discussed in this article he is going to be sued over it. I would think AIB’s and this site’s E&O policies are in full effect and premiums up to date (it would be stupid to write this article without such a policy) but no one likes to be sued whether it costs them money or not.

Leave a Reply