Comments on: Is Gregg Dodson and skyn talent a Pimp ? Is Trinity St Clair a scammer? Is Cytheria A Prostitute and gfe dating front for pristitution? You decide

By: Bait and Switch? Or Does Trinity St. Clair & Gregg Dodson’s 'Porn Companions' Book Charlie Sheen Ex Brett Rossi? - Mike South

Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:07:29 +0000

[…] about the home page for Porn Companions, the porn star escort site run by Trinity St. Clair and Gregg Dodson. That something was an advertisement for porn star Brett Rossi, right out in the […]

By: Consent, Coercion and Rough Race Play Gone Wrong: Who's Looking Out For Adult Performers? - Mike South

Sat, 10 Mar 2018 04:00:23 +0000

[…] their shoots directly, without the use of a talent agent. Nixon is still listed on the website of Skyn Talent, but she has moved on and is currently […]

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:51:17 +0000

In reply to Dirty Bob.

I don’t know about Christi Lake but producer “Porno” Dan Leal does Fuck-A-Fan scenes on his paysite (along with other loose plot lines like fucking contests between porn girls). I don’t have the website address handy but Google “Immoral Productions” and you will likely find his site. Evidently he makes money, he has been doing the fun type scenes for at least five years now and produces more than he ever did before nowadays. If you like to see fans fucking porn chickies this might be something you are interested in.

For the record Porno Dan pays his fan male talent for the “Fuck-A-Fan” scenes, they aren’t paying him. One big difference between Porno Dan and Gregg Dodson’s company.

By: tilmans

tilmans — Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:25:11 +0000

In reply to SabrinaDeep. actually getting $ from the fans is probably the only residuals these girls ever get..

By: SabrinaDeep

SabrinaDeep — Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:40:24 +0000

Too little info to judge, Mike, sorry. It could be that the guy signs a (co-)producing contract and in that case it’s nothing different than a shooting with a fan or working for Porn Dan and shooting with him, or with James Deen and his producing company etc.. Anyway, it’s funny to see how i have been estranged and looked at suspiciously by this industry when i started doing fans, traveling the world, giving away my phone number etc. 8 years ago out of the amateur label and now everybody is jumping on it as if they discovered hot water. Expect some big names starting touring, at some point this year. I’m not use to brag, but it was clear to me when i entered this industry that fan exploitation would have become inevitable in order to break the porn market impasse and to fight tubes and piracy. Production fragmentation is already a reality and with fans exploitation running at the speed of light, i expect also tubes relevancy to decline rapidly within the next two years. The future is to involve the average Joe in the financial side of a project , rather than selling him a video for 30 bucks, and at this pornstars have definitely an advantage over production companies which will need to evolve if they don’t want to be cut off. In the end, you just need a good camera, a location and some editing skills to make a porn movie and being in charge of the financial and safety aspects is priceless as we all know. Distributors will always distribute what sells and they will adapt.

By: spawn777

spawn777 — Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:04:18 +0000

Someone wrote a piece a while back about why porn is not prostitution, because the emphasis is on the performance, and actually the sex. This case highlights that. If it wasn’t on camera, then it WOULD be prostitution This situation however, is almost like Joe Blow producing his own porn film, and paying for the talent out of his own pocket. The only problem with that theory is that he has not stake in the profits. They should probably give him tiny percentage, and they would have that contingency covered 🙂

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:59:36 +0000

In reply to common sense.

I don’t have a problem with prostitution per se but paying for cybersex (without penetration, obviously) doesn’t sit well with me. If I am going to pay for sex with a woman I want the real thing compete with at least dick to pussy penetration (and a blow job would be great if she were willing). I certainly won’t pay $40K to have a chick talk dirty to me while I jack off (and not $9200 to fuck a porn chickie when I can get a cute local prostitute for $300 an hour or so — so for $500 or so including hotel room I could have a great time)! Madeline and Lorelei may be hot but jacking off to them while they talk dirty to me via computer over a thousand miles away isn’t worth forty cents!

By: common sense

common sense — Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:06:49 +0000

In reply to nvm. MOST if not all of the people in this industry escort not just some of the women listed in the above story. Lol

By: common sense

common sense — Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:58:26 +0000

In reply to jilted.

I bet if one of them had/has any STDS (and I am positive one of them does) I doubt they informed/will inform this guy before the “shoot”.. All they see/saw is this guys $9,200 and they aren’t gonna give that up for a silly STD… this crazy sap is gonna have a funny feeling real soon.. 😉

By: common sense

common sense — Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:47:05 +0000

In reply to mharris127. I think anyone who has to pay for sex is a loser anyway yet alone spend thousands of dollars for it. And cybersex no less... Good grief! If that doesn't spell pathetic I don't know what does!