Yes

FYI every state assembly is required to open sub-committee hearings to the public for pro/con and comments/questions. California has the option to limit speakers to two pro/con but did not do so in this case.

The industry was much better represented at this hearing and had over 250 notices of performer opposition.

Wonder if APAC is gonna have a meeting Sunday may 4th? In April they were going gangbusters to get folks there and the FSC barkers were having a heyday before and after.

What are you jabbering about? I was referring to this specific committee and vote. As were you presumably. Did both sides make an argument to this committee specifically?

Maybe we should forward this to Dianne Duke, Karen Tynan, and the rest of the FSC.

I was thinking of how to explain this to you young grasshopper, in language that you ‘might’ understand, and I came across this very educational video on how our government works. I hope you learn something, and to the rest of you, well, just enjoy.

This vote was debated upon by the public? You seem to be suggesting that both sides presented an argument to these 6 individuals. Is that correct?

@jilted did they bring up anything other than what was in the FSC fax campaign?

To hell with the FSC and Michael Whiteacre is crying along with his bitch male partner. They have to watch and jackoff to condom gay porn together. Boohooo