Yes
FYI every state assembly is required to open sub-committee hearings to the public for pro/con and comments/questions. California has the option to limit speakers to two pro/con but did not do so in this case.
The industry was much better represented at this hearing and had over 250 notices of performer opposition.
]]>Wonder if APAC is gonna have a meeting Sunday may 4th? In April they were going gangbusters to get folks there and the FSC barkers were having a heyday before and after.
]]>What are you jabbering about? I was referring to this specific committee and vote. As were you presumably. Did both sides make an argument to this committee specifically?
]]>Maybe we should forward this to Dianne Duke, Karen Tynan, and the rest of the FSC.
]]>I was thinking of how to explain this to you young grasshopper, in language that you ‘might’ understand, and I came across this very educational video on how our government works. I hope you learn something, and to the rest of you, well, just enjoy.
]]>This vote was debated upon by the public? You seem to be suggesting that both sides presented an argument to these 6 individuals. Is that correct?
]]>@jilted did they bring up anything other than what was in the FSC fax campaign?
]]>To hell with the FSC and Michael Whiteacre is crying along with his bitch male partner. They have to watch and jackoff to condom gay porn together. Boohooo
]]>