@mikestabile

Your credibility isn’t and was never at issue. OSHA deviating from procedure is the issue. The stonewalling and deflection to unravel this mystery has now progressed to written communications at the Federal Level of OSHA and is looking like it will require legal recourse on my part.

‘Complaints’ may be combined to prevent several ‘Activity reports’ and ‘Violations’ arising from any number of complaints and/or activity reports are commonly referenced into one ‘Citation’

The problem isn’t that multiple ‘complaints’ were combined…the problem is the fourth (and still unexplained) unique ‘activity report’ issued. After initially combining several ‘complaints’ into three separate ‘activity reports’ which resulted in one ‘citation’ for ‘violations’ this fourth unique ‘activity report’ was issued without reference to the previous three. Procedurally this fourth unique identifier in the absence of the other three is a serious no no.

That’s like saying …kink used eight ‘contracted talent’ in three unique ‘content shoots’ for one ‘feature product’ and that ‘feature product’ was used to create a new ‘content shoot’ …while any number of products can happen from the shoots there is no way possible to create a shoot from the product without using (referencing) the prior three shoots.

She did reach out to you on Twitter, Mike… fyi. I believe she wanted your Skype info.
I’d read her blogs first if I were you……

NP man I think Tiffany is going to regret this and if and when she does reach out to me it will make it harder to take her seriously but I will do what I can should it happen. If she was sent to a private under the guise that it was a legit shoot that shit should stop…she has a leguit gripe, but I dont see where Randazza and all that fits into it…(yes i read her timeline some)

@Billy

Did you miss the five years of meetings FSC participated in with OSHA? Maybe the LAtimes and all the other publications that love to quote the ‘industry trade association’?

Hey at least were talking and not quoting the damn party lines that mean jack shit.

Thank you Mike. Not a wise choice to go with Monica, funny how TRPWL didn’t pick on this. Oh, I forgot they are in bed with TLC.

Policy Makers? What are you talking about? I really don’t get all this FSC talk. They have absolutely no power at all in this industry. I’ve never heard anyone Talent/Producers/Directors/Agents talk about the FSC. It’s mostly all done on this site.

Tiffany has chosen NOT to give me that story, she is pursuing it with monica Foster and the way it has gone off track on on to other people I dont think theres a lot of credibility there.

if any girl will go on the record about Derek or anyone else I want to hear it, but if they dont talk to me theres not much i can do till something happens.

LMAO can anyone imagine what would happen if agents told private client, she’ll only do legit scenes so if you want her a tripod camera isn’t gonna work, but I can book a camera guy for an extra $500 whose good enough to hide your face and we’ll edit out any accidental face images?

In hindsight Nannula would say its a bargain, he probably would have even gone another five bills for final edit rights 😉