This comment was posted on the Big Proud Scrotal Sacks blog I put up:
“Would you pay $11.82 for a plate? I would. Mikasa, a 60 year old dinnerware company, sells a Cheers Diamond Dinner Plate for just about that price. From their website: “The Cheers pattern is made of fine china that is accented with whimsical dots, stripes, and spirals for a cheerful and useable mix and match concept. All pieces are dishwasher and microwave safe, and are sure to be used day in and day out.” Versatility in style and durability in construction. $11.82 is 1/118th of $1,400.00.
Incidentally, 17 cents is also just about 1/118th of $27.13. 17 cents is what it would cost me - in wear and tear to my computer, electricity, and broadband connectivity - to spend 140 minutes (in 7 twenty-minute sessions) looking at free pictures of you on Freeones.com. A simple use of their “order by date” function shows that there were 85 free galleries featuring you as of August 1st, 2008. If, on average, each gallery features 15 pictures and if I spend, on average, 10 seconds looking at each one, accounting for an additional 30 seconds needed for navigation, it will take me an average of 3 minutes to consume a gallery. I would need to look at 7 galleries in order to spend a full twenty minutes on that site; and I would need 49 galleries in order to do so 7 times. Leaving me another 36 galleries of which I have no need, except perhaps to compensate for any redundant galleries.
All fascinating, certainly, but why the figures? Why, specifically, 20 minutes, 7 times, and $20.13?
If individual photo galleries and/or videos on your pay website, ClubKayden.com, are in keeping with what I, to the extent of my knowledge, consider to be the average size/length of particular updates on other porn sites, then it would take me 20 minutes to consume an update from ClubKayden aswell.
If, on August 1st, 2008, I had purchased a one-month subscription to your site, I would have had access to 7 updates featuring you - either solo or with another person(s). This is the date at which, as best as I can tell, your has been live - or at least providing significant content. It is all I would have had to look at.
If I were to consume “new” (to me) content featuring you via Freeones.com at the same rate that I would be able to consume it from ClubKayden.com, it would have cost me a price that was 1/118th of the same 140 minutes spent consuming ClubKayden content. Instead of paying $19.96 for a month of access, and in addition to the same 17 cents worth of fixed costs, I would only be paying the fixed costs. $0.17 is 1/118th of $20.13.
Now, of course, my argument falls apart once we consider any activity beyond this 30 day time frame. After just another 30 days - September, 2008 - my virtually-free source of Kayden Kross content from Freeones would exhaust itself. The rate in which new galleries are added could not keep up with the rate at which I would consume them. Additionally, if taken as a whole, the monthly update average on ClubKayden increases by over 50% - from 7 to just over 11 - in latter months. Eventually, I would be left with no choice but to subscribe to ClubKayden in order to consume unseen content. This would run up the cost to just over 60% of what it would have cost to just subscribe in the first place and to forego the free content. Or, in “plate terms,” I would be paying $840.00 for a plate; hardly expressive of a fundamental difference in my previous attitude towards money.
But such extra-contextual considerations beg the question: why consider them? What is it about the product which guarantees that irrational financial decisions are inevitable? Especially when the difference between rationality and irrationality is so strikingly large? Why wouldn’t a rational man, when you slapped him with such an increase in cost, give you a virtual “fuck off” and go find another woman’s free content? Why would he take your shit?
If you claim to be the type of person unwilling to exploit the weaknesses (ie: irrationalities) of men, and if you claim to hold their money in high regard, and if you wish to be certain of it for longer than an evening of blogging about it, you must answer that question. You must explain why so much of your pornographic content - the source of your livlihood - is available for next to nothing when so much of virtually the same thing is available aswell, but at an 11,800% mark up. Or, more accurately, you must explain why this comports with your professed convictions.
You must explain to yourself why the emotions driving that woman to substitute a $1,400.00 plate for authentic respect for her husband are not the same emotions driving a man to substitute a $20.13 porn site subscription for the capacity for sexual joy that 17 cents worth of electricity, internet connectivity, and free content is supposed to be sustaining (and not exploiting). Explain to yourself why that psychologically neutered man you observed is not doing the same thing as a sexually patinaed woman giving into whatever weak pretentiousness she thinks she must identify, entertain, and ultimately appease in order to survive - and fluorish (financially at least).”
Ok as weird and out of context as I find your post, I’ll respond to it. Forget the fact that you’re comparing a personal relationship to how I run a small adult entertainment business. Whether a man determines that he gets any utility from some hardcore pictures of a stranger vs. how he lets his life partner treat him have no correlation as far as I can tell. What I can tell you is that those I know personally I’ve already given free login information to. That alone should hurt your argument.
You’re confusing hormones with emotions. Hormones are what drive people to search for jack off material on the internet. People don’t pay for membership to my site because they’re emotionally attached and I’m stringing them along. They’re paying for my site because they have dicks and healthy sexual appetites and I happen to appeal to their jack off taste for the moment. If you think I should be offering this service for free then you obviously are no objectivist yourself.
You must understand utility as well. I’m sure you do. I’m sure you aren’t assuming that the personal satisfaction that man got out of the $1400 dish was at all equal to the personal satisfaction that a man must get out of a month’s worth of fresh updates for $20.
Even if you were right, and my naked pictures have somehow skyrocketed to the level of a marital relationship, then your numbers are wrong.
You are basing everything on the number $1400 for a month. I guarantee that woman cost the eunuch much more than $1400 that month. I would say even more than $1400 just that day. I doubt she got decked out and went down to the mall with him for one dish. She already had shopping bags on her arms. She was covered in jewelry and Burberry. So unless I’m charging $20 a day for membership you can’t even compare the two (not that you should be in the first place).
Now you don’t seem to understand the online adult business very well either. I’m no expert, but after reading your response I can gage that I know more than you. You based your numbers on a 15 picture set. Do you know why Freeones gets free 15 picture sets? Because they are teaser sets given to them by the site that owns the content. For example, when ClubKayden.com or Suze.net sends 15 pictures to Freeones, Freeones then links back to the site and creates traffic. And it’s called a teaser because you’re only seeing 15 pictures out of a 90 picture set. So recalculate the time it takes you to consume a full set.
Please also recalculate the time it would take you to go through the content on my site. My site went officially live Sept. 15th, but we did a trial launch on Sept. 1st. Do you honestly think I launched my site with no back dated galleries and videos? Do you think I turned on my site and whoever signed up got access to my one and only content update for that day? No. Stupid. I shot and stored content for one year before my site went live. And do you really believe that you’re only getting 7 updates a month? The first month we did daily updates, and now we do updates 5x a week.
You also dumbed down exactly what you get out of a membership. A membership to ClubKayden.com does give you original picture updates. That’s what you based your math on. Now please calculate in the original video updates, the live chats, the girl of the month updates, and the hardcore content from other models. All of these things are updated weekly. That means new pictures, new videos, new hot girls, new chats, and new hardcore sex every single week. Then factor in the interaction that you absolutely cannot find pirated on the internet somewhere and you’ll see why a rational man would be able to justify the $20 expense. That’s cheaper than what it would cost for one DVD or lap dance at the local strip club after your cover fee and $9 soda. Or are you saying it’s irrational to satisfy any sexual desire?
Now if you buy a monthly membership to the site it does come out to about $20 per month. But you can buy a package and get it for half the monthly amount if you know you’ll be sticking around. See, we already thought of those who might exhaust the backdated stuff. I assume the first number you threw out (17 cents being 1/118 of 27.13) was a typo because 23 cents is actually 1/118 of 27.13. You did come back down to the correct math later in your post (20.13). I don’t know how you can factor in your energy and broadband and wear and tear costs at 17 cents (my cost is higher and I don’t think I’m overpaying), but I’m not going to jump to conclusions on your rigorous math.
Anyway, hopefully with this new insight you’ll be able to recalculate and come back with a better attack.