Comments on: Is SnapChat putting the smack down on porn? Looks like it!

By: Is SnapChat Premium porn friendly? Turns out not so much! - Mike South

Thu, 11 May 2017 02:52:29 +0000

By: lukas411

Wed, 10 May 2017 09:43:03 +0000

Porn is what keeps snapchat going. what the hell else are you going to use it for?

]]>

By: Kelli

Mon, 08 May 2017 00:02:44 +0000

Just wanted to add, according to Natalia Starr she wasn’t posting hardcore content on her SnapChat account. That is what makes this whole ban even more disturbing.

That means they nailed her just because she was a porn star, not because of any actual porn that was posted.

]]>

By: Kelli

Sat, 06 May 2017 21:36:48 +0000

I noticed that with some of their accounts. “38 photos, and 11 video clips” and thought damn they want $20 or $30 a month for that??? Okay then.

Funny thing is, I remember when Eva Angelina launched her initial “official site” with that Bill Fox guy. It had like 8 videos. It was like that for years. Not sure if it ever improved, but people actually paid month after month for that shit? Seriously?!

When her new official site launched with premium cash, they had the same 8 videos, plus like 10 more exclusive scenes and that was something more obviously, but still in the end that’s only 18 scenes and they wanted like $30 a month and people paid it! I made so much money back in the day as an affiliate of her site.

Again in premium cash’s credit, they did also offer the members joint access to other sites in the network. But anywho 😛

]]>

By: Karmafan

Sat, 06 May 2017 17:04:28 +0000

Only someone with more disposable income then brains would drop $10-30 a month for a few photos on Onlyfans.

]]>