@Bt
Sure it works if Hunsicker is bringing cases into Brustein firm with Brustein filing as the attorney of record. Since Hunsicker isn’t listed on the firm site he could be acing as IC…still leaves mystery as to how reporter came to be quoting Hunsicker vs Brustein Firm or firm representing her etc.
]]>So pure speculation on my part. Buyer beware of my ignorance of this situation. Where I live, there’s a personal injury attorney who signs up lots of cases – advertises like crazy; people think he’s great. But, if he can’t settle the case quickly, he outsources it to a real trial lawyer. He, himself, never goes to court. That could be what’s going on here – one attorney signs up the case and tries to negotiate a quick, out of court settlement. When that doesn’t work, brings in a trial attorney to go to court. Even at large, white collar corporate law firms, there are attorneys who bring in cases and get them going, but when the rubber hits the road and its going to court, its turned over to the firms litigators. They’re really two different skills. Similarly, appeals are a skill unto their own. So, this could be nothing more than that. Hunsicker is good at signing cases up and settling out of court; Brustein is your guy if its going to the next step.
]]>@BT
Exactly …doesn’t look like Hunsicker was listed then removed as attorney either since there’s no docket entry for change of counsel unless Hunsicker is working under Brustein who it seems has been around a while.
]]>Pure speculation, but …… looks like Hunsicker is a personal injury, slip & fall, worker comp attorney (aka – ambulance chaser). He doesn’t have a website, but on one of the Chicago lawyer sites it says he specializes in the above. Brustein appears to be the attorney with business litigation experience (http://www.dimontelaw.com/abraham_e__brustein.htm), but even that looks like he specializes in bankruptcy and re-organization.
It’s a mystery, that’s for sure.
]]>What about your wifey Christina, Fake Ari? Doesn’t she give better strap-on lovin than Bonnie (remember, if you say no she may just give you a pair of Irish Sunglasses otherwise known as two black eyes). 🙂
]]>Thanks to Fake Ari and Fake Sean for today’s entertainment. They will be doing stand-up comedy at the Mike South Comedy Club in downtown Atlanta, GA all week. Two drink minimum. 🙂
Seriously, I don’t think Fake Ari and Fake Sean are actually Monica Foster’s work (that is the usual person referred to as “Coco Loco” in porn). The tone is way different than she usually takes.
]]>Of course I should expect that when it comes to porn chasing down a solid fact is like attempting to keep Frosty the Snowman a snowman for a trip to the tropics.
]]>” if Bonnie Rotten wanted to file in federal court, she could file in any district in the US where she can get a lawyer to file it if it meets the dollar threshold. I don’t understand why its in a circuit court in Chicago, which really is designed for local matters.”
Also intrigued by the choice of Cook County despite inclusion of claim that non-paying viewers included those from Illinois.
Don’t know if these thoughts are relevant or not…
Cook County is a circuit court but it’s also one of (if not the) largest court in the world organized under a Chief Judge.
Cook County is a liberal court, First District (state) is limited to Cook County (also liberal) Springfield where IL Supreme Court is votes conservative but the court leans left yet the 6th Federal District is conservative.
Lost track of what happened with NC redistricting but circuit and district issues are trumped with 4 of 7 NC supreme courts up in the air and lots of pressure to push the state judiciary more red as well as the 4th Federal.
Makes sense to stay out of Ninth and 11th which could both be seen as Max’s home turf…even the First (NH) or Third (PA) so what makes Cook County more attractive than somewhere in NY, CT or Vermont and the Second Federal with its history of being more First Amendment friendly than Sixth?
Not trying to play political tic tac toe…jurors tend to be registered voters and it seems like a factor to consider as well as courts historical decision records. Even if the First Amendment is never raised as a legal issue…in a case like this It makes sense to rule out content prejudices every way possible. So I’m still intrigued.
Lol for all I know Pornhub viewing stats make voters and judges more appealing in Cook County.
]]>is the fake ari bass coco loco?
]]>