Comments on: What this Country Needs

By: stevelick

Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:49:07 +0000

This is an excellent post Mike.

Kissing the ass of a pastor who dances around with rattlesnakes every Sunday does not represent modern potential voters. I work in a big city, support flat tax initiatives, am a strict constitutionalist, and love to fuck women that I barely even know as often as possible. There are thousands of other people out there just like me. As long as republican candidates refuse to acknowledge that we exist and choose to instead market themselves to abortion clinic skeet shooters, they will never see a campaign contribution out of my pocket.

]]>

By: BrianInPowderSprings

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:57:52 +0000

Besides the invention of the cock ring, name the great accomplishments of atheism. It has been my experience atheists are angry mom and dad made them go to sunday school and their just gonna SHOW those CHRISTIANS a thing or two. There’s half satisfying debate about divine existence that atheist love to win.
Okay, atheists, have it your way.

While you’re at it, where does joy come from?

]]>

By: Goddess

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:39:58 +0000

BTW, whether or not the country would elect a homosexual over an atheist in this country depends on whether or not there’s a natural disaster around election time. (And no, I’m not talking about the election itself.) Cuz that’s the only time people in this country know God.

]]>

By: Goddess

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:36:19 +0000

We might as well have an atheist for President. The country shits itself at the mere mention of God at Christmas time–heaven forbid we say Merry Christmas instead of the politically correct Happy Holidays–or have a nativity display in public. And don’t even mention the word God in their Pledge of Allegiance or in school. Puhleeze.

]]>

By: Jerry Seinfeld

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:57:48 +0000

Interesting you say that, recent poll says Americans are more likely to elect a homosexual 56% than an atheist 46%. Weird stat and who would have thought.

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?story_id=11920933

]]>