I for one would love to have some Jewish bodybuilder plow his fist right into a Holocaust denier’s mouth. People ask me why I am so pro-Israel. My answer is we owe them a safe country to live in after what Adolf had done to six million of their parents and grandparents in the name of Christianity even if it takes shipping every last Arab in Israeli territory to another country and bombing the piss out of those that refuse to leave (I guarantee after one or two bombings they will get the fuck out of Israel without any further action on our part). I have seen more than enough evidence to prove to me that the Holocaust did take place and that it was beyond horrible for the Jews living in Europe at that time. The least Western society can do is ensure they have a place to live safe from their enemies.

Holocaust denial is science fiction or fantasy and not based on reality.

thats easy …no because the first person to bring up Nazis in an internet argument loses. Everyone knows that…It’s called Godwins Law.

and thats the point…it isnt a hypothetical its real and Lester Maddox was a bleeding heart next to others I remember like J B Stoner. There are times when it seems cut and dried that as an owner of something I may do as I please with it, other times…not so much.

I suspect this site is worth more than $50K, especially if it includes your continued services. You have a lot of contacts in the adult film industry that a new owner probably would not have which would make your continued services necessary for the site to survive in its current form. I also think if you were to sell you would feel regret about selling after about six months.

Another issue if you were to sell is that you get into the mainstream media with this site at least twice a year. That “advertising” drives a lot of traffic to this site (we have discussed a website that measures this before on here, traffic does go up substantially when an article including you hits the mainstream media) and likely through the advertising links you have here to your pay porn sites. If you were to sell this site so cheap it might end up being a money loser as you would have fewer new subscribers for your pay sites due to the loss of advertising (what could be the increased server and bandwidth costs for mikesouth.com — maybe $1000 a month at most — banner ads on five industry sites would cost that or more each month and probably bring in less business). This site may sometimes lose money if you only consider this site’s expenses and outside advertising revenue (I currently count eight outside ads on here, at $100 a month each — a lowball estimate — this site brings at least $800 a month in ads alone) but I think once the extra subscriptions to your pay sites from readers here are factored in this site likely makes you money, unfortunately without reprogramming parts of both this site and your pay sites (way beyond my abilities, I am certainly not a computer programmer) so this traffic and the subscription rate could be measured the amount of this is hard to ascertain.

LOL true dat….and LIB isnt even worth 11K now prolly…although cindi was dreaming thinkiing she wold get 50 for it…..offer me 50 and Ill sell mikesouth.com and even continue to wwrite for 6 -12 months 😉

Things could always be worse. This site could turn into LukeIsBack. New owner killed all Cindi’s traffic, viewers, and commentators. Now she is trying to sell her whole network for 11k. Cindi was selling LIB for 50k when she was the owner and now its only worth 11k?

I’m not afraid of my man turning gay; i’ve got nothing against being gay, to the contrary. Your words suggest that you would be pretty pissed if your partner turned gay, instead. It’s typical of the politically correct fanboys to be gay with someone else’s ass.

An agenda cannot turn someone gay; you might be right, although you forget to argument your statement and therefore it has the same credibility as Michael opposite statement, in my book. But an agenda can aim at twisting the perception that people have about the subject and influence if not rule several aspect of their lives, also some very intimate ones.

Do you remember when until a few decades ago gay people were afraid to do coming-out as a result of centuries of Church and other lobbies agenda? Did those agendas turned gay people into straight people for centuries? Of course not. Gay people kept intimately liking same gender individuals and in many cases kept secretly engaging other gays in bed, but publicly they were married to the opposite gender making children, wearing what was considered straight etc. A political agenda, never aims at changing your true beliefs; a political agenda aims at changing your public life and externalized beliefs in a way that it is beneficial to the cause (officially to the cause of all humans, practically to the cause of few in terms of both power and finances).

That is what i have understood from Michael’s contribution and i certainly don’t feel like calling it garbage. There is a gay lobby which aims at going beyond rights equality and it’s no relief to know that straight people will continue being intimately straight if their freedom of externalizing their straightness will be limited at some point in some ways. You say it’s impossible? Think again. Discrimination comes from both sides and it’s always the result of opposite agendas which use rights equality and the natural state of things as a lever to subvert the status quo. One thing any lobbies are not interested in is rights equality. Once you can influence decisions, you’re not going to stop when the balance is even. There is no such a virtuous example in all humanity history.