@Mharris,
During the 2004 outbreak Mitch called for a performer meeting, Not the big one at the Hustler studio, But Mitch shceduled it for a Tuesday night, you know, Porn Kareoke night….there was a grand total of I beieve seven performers, two of them new girls who had only done one or two scenes each, while the regular crowd of about 40 or so turned up at Sardos. And they say performers are concerned about health and safety?
Ah PSK in the old days, Aria, Violet Blue, Nakita Denise, Missy Monroe, what a great bunch. Aria actually had a pretty good voice.

If people can bring booze, cocaine and marijuana to the meetings not much will get done, everyone will just drink Jagermeister, snort cocaine, smoke crack and toke marijuana all night. We know from that hosting gig at the XRCO awards Chanel Preston did that she loves her booze (the tape is on X360’s site), cocaine is well known to be a favorite of a small subset of porn performers and it seems about half of porn smokes pot. Sounds like one hell of a party, I hope Ricco, Mike, Lacey and I all get invitations. I think Ricco, Mike and I could all get laid by drunk/high porn chickies. Lacey will have to either become a lesbian for the night or masturbate to me getting laid by Chanel. 🙂

That transparent & predictable huh?

Haha… believe me, there is no crystal ball involved. 🙂

@Lacey

I want a crystal ball like yours…I think ya hit all the upfront questions.

I can even answer a couple…donations are now directed to a PO box. And APAC is no longer listed at corporationwiki, the Cal Secretary of State doesn’t include the registered agent on charity search form so I can’t know if they have updated their agent but I can confirm that the address listed at the SOS remains the same.

Round two….
What are the mistakes and how have you rectified them…(helps weed out assumptions) if I get time I’ll make a detailed list…then again maybe I’m not ready to show my hand.

Ooops..replace SOS with cal DOJ where charities are listed.

Oh, one more… will they be addressing the fact that there are many performers who are also producers? How do you determine impartiality?

-Are financial statements going to be released for talent to know exactly how any funds are spent? (Donations, etc.)
-Why were donations going to Kimberly Kane’s home address?
-Who handles the donation funds at this point? Who is listed as signers on bank accounts?
-Is anyone profiting from this organization? (See financial statement inquiry)
-If there are performers on the board who are represented by agents then how do they plan to keep agents from somehow interfering?
-Will they be releasing comprehensive information on how exactly the performer testing/PASS systems work? Especially for new performers…
-Is FSC affiliated attorney Karen Tyman still listed as registered agent?
-Is there actually a “board” and who exactly is on it?
-Will they be representing the CA porn industry or the entire industry including FL and other states?
-Are exclusive cam girls and guys included as well? Strippers who also perform? Any single person in the PASS system? Performers doing content trades? Performers who are based out of Las Vegas?
Who exactly is included in receiving assistance?

That should be a good start… I’m sure @Lurk will have 100s more.. 😉

I don’t really give a shit what the answers to these questions are… I’m not auditing them or anything, but if the organization wants to be taken seriously then they’re going to have to answer tough questions… these are pretty tough questions, but they are extremely important in determining the value of the organization. Just my very humble opinion.