Now I understand another sites post…if you worked since nov 20th test!

Not sure about CA..Ohio any licensed MD or PA can order the labs, patient doesn’t need to go to specific lab/draw center…lab tests reports to ordering doc and health dept if warranted. Doc orders confirmatory test, doesn’t matter what lab/draw center..test run, reports to doc and health dept…even when two different labs report the health dept can link…doc reports actual diagnosis for linking. Patient works with doc, health dept or opts out of partner notification services.

@jilted

Not saying this happening but can say one reason why a second facility might be used …a doctor can not make definitive HIV diagnosis without a second (different) confirmatory test…no second test, no diagnosis, no mandatory reporting to regulated health departments who do surveillance and containment of communicable disease.

Doc at each facility ONLY looks at what he has on hand…educates patient, encourages confirmatory testing, sends patient to different facility, confirmatory test is the only test information on hand, doc educates patient who already knows he doesn’t need a third test, patient goes to private doc or foundation for treatment. Private doc or foundation does a patient records request and/or runs new tests and makes diagnosis…..mainstream and really didn’t happen on set..no industry doc diagnosed or reported the HIV results that the clia lab did report.
Adult industry isn’t the only one looking to hide exposure risks…lots of stuff needs two tests and this how other industries have done it.

Why are you acting like them not naming a HIV+ person makes them bad or anything negative? That seems like a tough call to put someones name out there. To act like it’s some badge of honor that you named the person in your posts is stupid. Naming him or getting an interview doesn’t really say anything bad about someone who doesn’t. Do you want a cookie for naming him? Do you want someone to take away a cookie from other sites for not doing so? Worry about you dude. If you like what you do on your site that should be enough.

They havent even named the guy yet and I have an interview with him…while they have duke explaining what a moratorium is

And you know that both Helmy at XBiz and Theo at AVN have asked me why people in the biz dont trust them…SMFH

http://business.avn.com/articles/legal/Diane-Duke-Sez-What-You-Know-About-the-Moratorium-Is-Wrong-538460.html

She didn’t mention “condom” once. Not even in regards to those who may choose to shoot through the moratorium. At least she suggests being nice to one another. Talent can just pretend there are unicorns ejaculating rainbows inside of them. Then we can all walk through the gumdrop forest hand-in-hand.

Why does she feel the need to be defensive all of a sudden and clear things up? This seems more like it was done to uphold reputation that they feel may be slipping.

@Lacey

According to his Twitter he said he was really sick on November 20th and then comments again on feeling sick on the 2nd of December. How long before that did he have it? It could have been a while. Scary stuff.

And INCONCLUSIVE means exactly what it says, INCONCLUSIVE. It doesnt mean “no result” or “bad specimen.” If there was a problem with the specimen, like it was frozen, or not handled properly that is what the result would say. “Specimen contaminated” or “Specimen not suitable for testing” THere are three possible RESULTS for a PCR test, Detected, Not Detected, and Inconclusive, these are actual RESULTS. “Specimen contaminated” is not a result.

If you dont understand the trivial things, you dont understand the major things.