Playing devil’s advocate couldn’t it also be said lack of recourse chills expression? ig refusing pics out of concern they could later be posted without recourse.
]]>Could see an issue if the website/ publisher of user generated content were required to maintain consent records of every image posted or if a ‘formal contract’ were specified by the regulation, otherwise it comes across as a check/balance to thwart non-consensual posting of private images.
In this day and age when a she said – he said game of spin the bottle can derail a career perhaps it is in poster’s best interest to have prior proof of consent. Websites already use affirmative TOS agreements aka ‘prior consent’
]]>