In this case we don’t know if it would be considered an injury or not. We won’t unless and until a court rules on this issue. I would guess that since it is a medical issue and it happened as a result of employment that a Workman’s Comp insurer (in CA that likely would be State Fund) would be required to pay up. We’ll have to disagree on that one.

It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Workers comp, lol, pregnancy is not an injury.

My guess is that if Ms. Porn Chickie applies for governmental financial assistance every being with a dick that she has fucked within 90 days (either way if applicable) of the estimated conception date would be court ordered to take a DNA test — and the Child Support Office will view every porno scene she fucked in that could possibly be within 90 days of the estimated conception date to make sure no porno dick is missed. If no tested fuckee is the sperm donor than the chickie goes to prison/nightly anal- and oral-only gangbang fest by 25 horny guards for ten to life after being convicted of lying/withholding information on her Department of Social Services application, the baby is put up for adoption to a decent home and no one ends up paying child support. If there is an unlucky son of a bitch that tests prove with 99.99999999999999% certainty that he is the father than he either takes care of the kid himself or gets assessed child support and ends up fighting State Fund for reimbursement.

I wonder if the government would have Maury do the testing — special two hour episode of “Who’s The Daddy” with 92 men tested, special inside look at porn filming and the chickie will fuck Maury at the end. 🙂

Why the fuck would they need a proof of conception biopsy? The fucking dead baby is all the proof you need of conception, there has been only one baby born without sperm to egg conception taking place first and that was over 2,000 years ago — I don’t expect an immaculate conception to take place ever again!

IMO producer/performers worried about getting sued if prop 60 passes ought to be more concerned with disgruntled co-workers and industry enemies than California citizens.

Sabrina I expect something is lost in the translation its not a push for condoms it is an anecdotal “what if” . It is also an interesting legal question, As far as being a reason to choose to use condoms or not, as you pointed out that would be VERY low on the list….Not everything is about condoms or not.

Truth is you have a system that works well for you and as far as I am concerned thats the right thing for you. Many others who have websites and such could learn from you and I don’t think prop 60 is in any way an answer for them and the way prop 60 is written I don’t see it being a problem for them, despite what The FSC would have you believe it doesn’t give an average citizen the blanket right to sue performers and the reward IF the citizen should attempt to undertake such a suit is peanuts.

For a citizen to sue someone has to complain to OSHA, OSHA has to fail to investigate that complaint, then the citizen can sue, then it goes before a judge/Jury and IF the defendant is found guilty and the judge levies a fine the suer can claim 25% of that fine.

The idea that it jeopardizes the performers private info is also hogwash only producers can be sued, if the performer is also the producer and the performers partner complains and OSHA doesnt investigate (as they are required by law to do) and the complainant files suit the name and address are already public info in the form of the 2257 compliance statement. If the persons info isnt readily available the person suing doesn’t have any special means to discover that info.

The real problem with Prop 60 is the sheer amount of bullshit that is being said about it….

The real fact of the matter is that win lose or draw Prop 60 is going to have little effect on the long term outcome. Producers are going to have to shoulder the liability for STDs if they dont require condoms and they do require tests. producers are going to have to maintain a safe workplace and the only defense against civil liability is going to be the condom requirement, and even that is pretty thin in a civil lawsuit.

With all due respect, this is a cheap shot to push for condoms, Mike. Keep also in mind that if a girl wants to get pregnant, a condom is the least of her problems. If you are trying to say that condoms would avoid, among others, sues for child support I have to believe that you are running out of arguments. I’ll give you one: shut porn in particular and sex in general down and we solve STDs contagious, child support sues and even world over-population all at once. I keep not hearing a word about education, professionalism and code of conduct with related penalties for those who breech it. Instead I should feel victorious and safe if I was forced to fuck a diseased partner with a condom. I’m really losing faith. It’s like living nearby a leaking nuclear reactor and discussing which outfit protects you the most from radiations, instead of fixing the fucking leak.