discussion is good

Flattery and bribery won’t work on me. If merely offering it works on you, and so I have to state it explicitly instead of implicitly in order to keep us focused, I will.

If you really do, as you say, have a considered opinion of me, you’ll know what that my reasons for reading and posting on your blog is not to get anything directly from you.

and honestly Goodwill…how lucky am I to have Ms Kross as a consistent contributor. Agree with her or not she is an extraordinarily even writer for someone of her tender young age.

That is their purpose: to personify a certain luxurious example to the rest of the nation. To serve as an emotional fuel. If they insist upon doing it beyond the stage and screen, the least they could do is remain consistent with their theme.

It would be wonderful, if it were true, to hear an actress’ sincere evaluation of her movie’s production staff, or her slightly out of balance affair with chocolate, or even her refined experiences with that most complex and exhalted of human emotions: romantic love.

But today it is not true. In fact, their souls are much dirtier than that. The work which they produce suggests it loudly enough for most to sense it, but to articulate that distaste – let alone to oppose it – would require an intellectual understanding beyond the average person’s capacity. A capacity quickly filled in by the culture’s dominant intellectual trends; by way of their mouth pieces in the arts. Which is why celebrities naturally gravitate towards “serious issues”; to deflect attention from the obvious, but fleeting, fact that they are spiritual frauds. When left with nothing else, these types believe that having “serious concerns” will ensure a future legitimacy which they, like their public, vaguely sense they do not deserve.

You have unwittingly touched upon a very serious issue here, porn star.