Sure does, did you read of the lesbian HIV transmission? or did you miss that? Lesbians porn is gay porn also.

Lesbian porn is “gay” porn…there are NO straight performers.

Billy, four guys and a tranny running a train on some crackhead straight from the Rob Black News Studio and House of Ill Repute on Lankershim Blvd. would be interesting. However, I doubt you could find four guys and a tranny to run that train on a crackhead injection drug user. Even with Viagra et. al. the woman needs to be at least clean and somewhat attractive in order for these guys and tranny to get it up in the first place. I guess adult film will have to stick to tattooed “escorts” high on snortable, drinkable or swallowable drugs for the “dope fiends are sexy” crowd.

I do agree that something needs to be done about crossover performers. I disagree with your solution, though. I think testing needs to become standard operating procedure on both sides of the biz with serosorting (HIV+ with other HIV+ performers, HIV- with other HIV- performers and no mixing of the two serosorted groups unless one becomes HIV+ later and would be cast as such in the future if it happens to a performer after a change of policy). Unlike some commenters here I don’t necessarily have a problem with bisexual performers working both sides of the industry. It is the lack of testing and control on the gay side that is concerning. Unfortunately there will be some (like Treasure Island Media and their “two hundred loads of HIV positive cum in a guy’s HIV negative asshole” shoots) that will flout the rules and those performers will need to be isolated from the rest of the industry. However, I think most of both sides of porn production could be convinced to test their talent for HIV and other VDs if it were explained logically and calmly to the producers and company owners that the only other option is for the likes of Weinfuck and Izzy (otherwise known as the Butt Fuck Without Lube Boys) to continue their campaign to run porn out of California (and later the whole USA).

Because Its a another in line of many. Gay Male X over bandit and FSC approves of this Message. What Message ?
Its Ok for x overs to pollute the straight talent pool.
Again.
Also they have no intent on stopping this practice. So all they can do is cover it up and hope the controversy dies.
Next

I am a little puzzled why the industry is hiding this name after so many days. Anyone have an idea?

Bull shit. He was Not straight. He was a Tranny F&$?er. There is nothing straight about this kind of act.
You cannot apply a spin doctor twist on this one. He was not straight.
In Brazil shooting Straight porn eh..?
Righttttt
Again at the root cause of every HIV outbreak in the History of documented American related Porn, There is or was a common denominator in the mix.
A Cross Over Gay bandit, Sneaking one in or up on others on a set , or he infected his Significant other and the rest we all know. Many examples or all cases is an example of this

N24rc, This is your words, and I quote “BTW, there is PLENTY of known straight talent who have started in gay porn”
If this topic was not such a serious life changing event convo. I would start with a LMFAO..
Let me digest this for a sec, Straight Male performers who started in Gay Porn huh ? what straight male could perform an act reserved for a gay or “Bi curious” male on his way to discovery he is in fact gay. On Film for the entire world to see this act. Whatever mind altering Hallucinative cocktail you ingested, I suggest you get off it ASAP and revert back to what you have said poised to a retraction
Sometimes a few must sit by a road side and look at a rock and think and think.
Look, those who perform in cross over scenes and gay male escorting must not be allowed on straight sets Period.
Female talent should call their agents when alerts of a x over bandit is present on a set reserved for non gay porn
Are Producers so cheap or broke having to hire these gay male and Tranny performers ? Then again most directors shoot 10 scenes or less a month so they have tons a time to twitter book drunkards and retards and yes x overs that $100 a scene same day pay desperado ticking time bomb X over with no $$ for that Truvada HIV stomper eh.
I think for the most part Agents wont allow these types on sets. What agent with a bond who fears being blasted on this Site would pressure a female performer who calls in and wants to opt out of a shoot ?
Those who just hate agents vote wont count on this one this time. So no sounding off with biased rants.lol
Just the facts.
No X over on straight porn sets. Period
Dont gay porn pay more anyways.

The FSC’s cries of privacy are actually pretty funny. Back in 2004 when AIM was pringing the entire Qlist, complete with names, dates of tests, and test results there was NOT ONE SINGLE claim pf privacy violation(except darren james who sued, and settled out of court)

Not one single word from the FSC about privacy violations, but now that its their system privacy becomes a huge concern, And now they want to pawn it off to the performers,,,,,,,,Performers, you must pay for the tests yourself, and now the producers want the performers to also provide the access to their ‘availabiltiy’ system. Just like when AIM spent performers money to write IIPP plans for production companies…..performers pay for everything. Cant wait to see the stooges as APAC tackle this one. ONLY IN PORN

What about this hidden information about how you can get a Neg on an HIV test if your viral load is low enough. I know there is someone in the industry who gets Negatives if he were to test, and it is due to whatever drug cocktail he has been on for a long time. There are guys in the industry who HIV talk always looks at and so what about rumors they are doing that kind of regimen and testing Negative and continuing to do bareback straight scenes?