Comments on: Patient Zero Is https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/ The institute for the advance study of insensitivity and pornography Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:35:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Michael Whiteacre https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5374 Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:19:22 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5374 @DWB – You will like this article: http://www.openmarket.org/2011/09/02/a-condom-mandate-is-no-benefit-for-adult-film-actors/

]]>
By: DWB https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5373 Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:35:15 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5373 @mharris127 – We usually use condoms for production with shemales and on average go through 2 – 6 per scene. They break, slip off, talent needs a break so a new one is needed when they start again, and so on. But the point is, at least one will break, and there are several factors that can cause it to break. Lack of lube being one of them. All it takes is a little dryness and a hard stroke or two, and you’re barebacking.

Everything has risks. Some more than others. There is no perfect solution. All you can do is educate the performers the best you can and let them, who are all adults, make make their own decision. They then have to live with that decision, possibly for the rest of their life. If they don’t want to take the risk, don’t step foot into the hardcore side of the business. No group is going to save you, and very few people are going to look out for your best interest. It’s that simple.

]]>
By: mharris127 https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5351 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:01:47 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5351 Michael W., I have to agree that testing is safer than condoms. No piece of rubber is going to survive an hour of intense sex, I support the right to use condoms but they just weren’t made for that activity. I also hate the outside pop shot just as much as the rest of you but since finding out that Tricia Deveraux was likely infected with HIV by an anal internal pop I believe that outside pop shots are safer and warranted. It is easier to wipe up sperm off of skin with a baby wipe than to treat HIV from internal pop shots (and dufuses that ignore positive test results).

I certainly hope Tyler is actually negative for HIV but still he was irresponsible for working with a prelim positive result and the director was assinine for allowing it to happen (with Mike South’s reputation for being spot on with his reports, I unfortunately believe this Brazzers incident actually happened)!

]]>
By: DWB https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5346 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:20:08 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5346 @tammyfoxxx – And what happens when the condom breaks or slips off, which happens up to 12% of the time?

]]>
By: richard373 https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5321 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:22:12 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5321 The guy was test found have Hiv than director who should not let make porn movie used him know that fact beleave that he knew better than some hiv test. So test did not fail condom would not matter in this cae becuase had Hiv all ready would safe guard nothing. But what fail was system to safe guard other porn stars on set becuase as soon director made decision ingor test it took way any safe guard that test provide. If porn director gone ingor safty measure provide buy hiv test than test did nothing provide safty that should have. Looks like got negligent conduct make porn movie. If true in story get used word court term you well see alot of in this caes.

]]>
By: BlackAndBlueMedia https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5318 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:42:07 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5318 Current Test (30 days or less) + condoms would make entirely more sense than this “just wrap it” nonsense.

]]>
By: Michael Whiteacre https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5317 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:28:11 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5317 The W.H.O.? Really?

Yes, in the third world where there are often no nearby hospitals or testing facilities, condoms are better than nothing. However, we’re talking about adult production.

I’ve been on hundreds of adult production sets, only a handful of which were condom sets, and I’ve personally seen condoms fail three times. Three times out of maybe ten sets. Now of course that’s my anecdotal experience, but you won’t be convincing me any time soon of the viability of condoms as an effective defense against STIs.

Condom use can REDUCE the risk of chlamydia, much like for gonorrhea. Herpes and HPV only require skin-to-skin contact so if the skin is not covered by a condom, transmission is possible.

Here’s a quote from Nina Hartey, who’s done well over a thousand scenes since 1984:

“Due to the nature of porn sex as opposed to civilian sex, condoms make our job harder and put us at greater risk. While it seems counter-intuitive to say that using condoms on camera increases our risk, it remains true. First, porn sex lasts 40 to 60 minutes. In real life intercourse usually lasts under 10 minutes. Even with the use of lube eventually there is ‘condom wear’ or ‘condom burn’ for the woman. This can create micro abrasions in the vagina or anal canal, exposing her to potential pathogens. Intact skin is the best first line of defense. Even frequent changes of condom don’t change this fact. If the guy is exceptionally well-endowed the problem only gets worse. Since condoms decrease sensation in the man, both partners must work harder to maintain his erection, adding yet another layer of difficulty to an already difficult day…. The primary reason civilians need condoms is to prevent HIV and pregnancy. In porn we don’t [usually] ejaculate internally, so those concerns are mitigated. Most women are on birth control and HIV is killed upon exposure to oxygen. The much-maligned ‘pop shot’ actually has saved many, many lives, as it turns out. Condoms don’t protect against chlamydia, herpes, HPV (genital warts) or MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus).”

Best of luck to you, Tammy, with that whole “control” thing. I hope it works out for you.

]]>
By: raybbaby https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5316 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:05:20 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5316 IAFD has no mention of either Tyler Styles or Trey Tyler.

]]>
By: tammyfoxxx https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5313 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:55:09 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5313 Michael you are sooo wrong about condoms! The world health organization considers condoms the most effective way to prevent sexually transmitted infections. What does a test prove? Its a piece of paper that apparently producers are willing to DISREGARD.
As a woman, I know I have control when I insist on condoms!

]]>
By: Michael Whiteacre https://mikesouth.com/hiv/patient-zero-is-5469/#comment-5312 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:45:57 +0000 http://www.mikesouth.com/?p=5469#comment-5312 @BlackAndBlueMedia — Agreed, that if a producer flaunts his/her responsibility he/she is at fault. The same goes for producers who will accept tests from shady labs that have no protocols in place for medical follow-up, or exposure incident protocols. And the same goes for those labs; they are entrusted with the health of the people who test there and they KNOW that the patient, the producers, and the fellow performers will be relying upon those tests.

]]>