MIKEY, who do you think the healthdepartment heard this from. AIM you moron.
And it ahsnt been OFFICIALLY reported because they dont have the official resutl yet. Youare truly a moron MIKE and this proves it.

Now that you have been given these facts, why havent you responded to them, or is it just better to fan the flames and repeat the bullshit from the most negligent County Health Departnemt in the U.S. Oh thats right, this is Mikesouth.com, and any facts that support AIM are not welcome here, where as posts on gossip sites are take as gospel truth.

this dialogue is officially over.

As for the FDA, you know full well that the FDA is the slowest acting agency in our entire form of government. That is why AIM has NOT EVEN RECIEVED THE WESTERN BLOT RESULTS YET. If AIM were using that test they would NOT EVEN HAVE A POSITIVE RESULT ON THAT PATIENT TODAY.

Go to AIMS website right now. There are several posts there right now that comfirm this.

DID YOU GET THAT MIKEY….if they were using your test, they would not even have a positive result yet. To confirm an elisa(which itself is not a test, it is a methodology of testing) you must run a ‘western blot'(another methodolgy to confirm the elisa) It takes about 6 to 8 working days(dont coutn the weekends) to get a final confirmation on an elisa.

If we all followed Mikes advice, NONE onf this would even be out there yet.

Do you think what I just described above is preferential to the fact that AIM had positive result in 2 days after the patient was seen, or would you prefer the 6 to 8 days with your test.

Because the FDA is so slow, it is still an elisa confimation that is needed to ‘legally’ diagnose an HIV infection.

If we used your system MIKEY, you would not even have a positive result yet. Is that what you would prefer.\

Now please, continue being the horses ass.

The red cross, here in the unites states, and everywhere else in the world uses the pcr test to screen blood donations. They do not use the elisa.

But I guess Mike knows better than the red cross, after all, they are only responsible for the entire supply of blood products you and every single other person in this country uses to ensure a safe blood suppply.

I nominate MIKE SOUTH for surgeon general.

Now please, go to the AIM site and see what they are saying, not what somone told you they said. For gods sake, be responsible.

MIKE what do you think of the Red Cross using the pcr method of testing? SImple question, do you have the balls to answer it?

Directly from the redcross website.

NAT(Nucleic acid testing) NAT is a thecnology that can detect the genetic material of Hep C virus, HIV and West Nile Virus FASTER AND MORE ACCURATELY thean other tests, which react to antibodies of those viruses. ALL OF THE BLOOD COLLECTED BY THE RED CROSS FOR TRANSUSION IS NOW SUBJECTED THE THE NAT FOR HEP C, HIV AND WEXT NILE VIRUS.

Did you get the ‘FASTER AND MORE ACCURATELY” part there Mikey.

Only because the FDA still requires the lesser methods to be used do they still use those mtheods.

Did you get that ‘FASTER AND MORE ACCURATELY’
But I guess Mike knows more thatn the Red Cross.

An antigen, is any substance that causes the immune stystem to produce antibodies against it, such as a bacteria or virus.

Japan, Germany, France, England,China,Isreal,and almost every other country that screens its own blood supply has discontinued with the elisa method in screening their blood supply. The FDA is years behind, as is par for the course for that governmental organization.

Hey Mike, why dont you call your old friend, the one who wrote that letter you posted years ago, I think yousaid he was from the CDC. See what he has to say.

You are incorrect, about the WHO even though our guidelines are set forth by the FDA the Gold Standard test is the very same one they are using to confirm the results of your pcr-dna test you cling to so firmly.

Maybe you morons in California cant read medical documentation, I mean I know your public schools are bad…

you say the producer lied but the only people who have been proven to have lied is AIM…deal widdit.

So far, the producer in question has lied repeatedly. Of course you dont want to have any part in getting the real truth out when it gets in the way of your well documented personal vendetta against AIM.

And by the way, In 2003, the World Health Organization called “pcr’ testing the “NEW GOLD STANDARD”. Maybe up in them thar hills you hadnt heard about that yet. Just google it to confirm it yourself and get back to me about it. Of course you wont, youre busy being the horses ass.

And I see you did not evern respond to the “not cooperating’ issue you raised when I showed you the time frame for reporting positives by the clinic and the lab. Youre like a child who gets caught in his bullshit and then ignores the facts when presented to him.

As far as AIM lying, you are taking the word of gossip site posters as gospel truth. Yeah, good sources Mike.

Here’s the million dollar question MIKEY, Has AIM even recieved the “official’ confirmation follow up test results that are legally necessary to diagnose someone with HIV?

And the two milllion dollar question, did AIM DENY there was a positive or did they refuse to either confirm or deny when questioned BEFORE they had the follow up results?

When you know the answers to these questions then please continue to make yoursle look like the horses ass that you are.

Why should anyone believe them now?

The governemet entity to which HIV resutls are f=reported does NOT by law, report this to the division headed by Dr. Fielding, who himself is one of the most negligent health department officials in the United STates.