Comments on: Man who took PrEP gets HIV

By: Fabrise

Fabrise — Mon, 01 Apr 2019 20:59:39 +0000

So much for that. Under 73% success rates
Not good enough

https://mg.co.za/article/2012-06-14-jury-out-on-using-arv-prophylaxis

By: FlacFan

FlacFan — Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:06:32 +0000

Unlike the earth, where pictures exist of it’s roundness. Show evidence like that that an undetectable virus can’t be transmitted and then give HIV to a new person.
It’s still there, you just can’t detect it. I am failing to understand why an entire work force should be forced to possible exposure. And yes it is forced.
Infected worker works with Star A. Star’s B,C,D And F don’t want to, star E doesn’t care. however now star ‘A’ and ‘E’ is on the no list for B, C D And F.
Subsequently, any one that A or E works with will be added to the list. This policy places the work experience of the few over the many.

You are infected? Fine you can only work with other infected stars.
You are a negative cross over, that’s informed consent, but the above scenario, imo, will play out. And anyone who speaks out about it will be labeled and hated for self preservation.

August Ames. Never Forget.

By: Kelli

Kelli — Sun, 31 Mar 2019 08:05:22 +0000

I’m very happy to hear that TTS stood up for our performers, going against the FSC to offer the new test. Of course, now the FSC is attacking them for anything and everything they can. Sad really.

By: femmeporn

femmeporn — Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:33:47 +0000

performers have the right to know whether someone is HIV+ before working with them. they agree to work with someone under the pretenses that they are negative, i feel if they knew they weren’t a lot of performers might change their mind on performing w such individual who is pos.

By: Karmafan

Karmafan — Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:20:24 +0000

I still think the FSC would rather all performers be HIV+ and be done with the controversy.

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:42:44 +0000

I agree. Once someone is HIV positive that person can (in many states) legally only fuck those that share having the disease unless he/she reveals that he/she is HIV positive and the HIV negative partner agrees to be stupid as hell and have sex with him/her. Morally, that person should never have sex with an HIV negative person ever again.

As for the FSC’s recent attempt to force performers to have sex on-set with an HIV positive performer in order to work in this industry, Eric LePew (excuse me, Leue) needs to have his dick and balls cut off and shoved down his flamboyantly homosexual throat! If he really had unprotected sex with an HIV positive person he is as dumb as a whole warehouse full of hammers! I do support serosorting where HIV positive performers would be allowed to work with other HIV positive people but they should never be allowed to work with HIV negative performers on an adult film industry set!