Comments on: The FSC calls a Preliminary Hold on Production

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:22:20 +0000

I hope you are correct, Kelli. That is not how Eric’s statement reads but your interpretation would make more sense. I did allow for the possibility that Eric’s comment was poorly written but with the Fucking Shithead Coalition we never know.

By: Kelli

Kelli — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:03:44 +0000

BTW I think the article refers to personal websites, clips4sale type websites and porn star’s official websites, not major production sites such as Brazzers, Kink, etc.

By: Kelli

Kelli — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:01:57 +0000

As we have learned over the years, the FSC has one goal in mind and that is to be able to maintain that there have been “no on-set transmissions”, so they have to have a very narrow definition of what an adult set actually means. As we’ve learned over the years, when it comes to the FSC always read between the lines and never take anything they say at face value.

By: spawn777

spawn777 — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:10:58 +0000

I could be wrong, but I don’t think they are referring to marquee web sites, but rather small personal sites that could be part of content trades. It still a hole, but not jumbo jet-sized.

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:43:41 +0000

Welcome back, Hop. Just because I don’t support mandatory condoms (we have had this conversation before here on Mike South) doesn’t mean I support lackadaisical information on possible HIV infections out of the VD testing organizations in the industry. Saying that a performer hasn’t been “on an adult set” during the testing period and then qualifying that statement to exclude half of all adult industry sets is next to useless. Anyone doing such a poor job on a term paper for me would have had a big, red “F” written on it. If I had done such a poor job on a term paper, dissertation or exam when I was in college I would have received it back with that big, red “F” on it as well. The FSC’s job here (assuming the article was written properly) deserves that big, red “F” on it along with the cum from a 50 man bukkake and a steaming pile of dog shit.

BTW, Kelli Roberts (a guest writer here on Mike South) had an article on her site expounding on the “rumor” that is going around the industry. Most of the time her articles are right on the money in times like these. I will allow the new owners of this site to decide how far they want to go down that road but assuming the article is still pertinent a re-print on this site might be a reasonable thing to do.

By: Hop Sing

Hop Sing — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 02:26:09 +0000

@harris

You’re certainly very passionate about this topic, Matthew.

By: Karmafan

Karmafan — Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000

I wonder if official “adult film set” also means privates, bachelor parties, or whatever buzz word is being used to describe escorting.

By: mharris127

mharris127 — Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:19:50 +0000

I don’t wish to jump to conclusions about a preliminary HIV positive test within the industry so I won’t go further on that directly. However, you (an author is not listed, just “porn news”) bring up a glaring problem that even Mike South himself didn’t bring up in any of his numerous posts regarding VD testing protocol in the US straight/lesbian adult video industry. You mention that the prelim positive performer hadn’t (knowingly to PASS, the testing clinic or FSC) “. . . been on any adult set. . .” that the qualifier “. . . that doesn’t mean they haven’t had sex with an active performer offset, on a content trade or for what the FSC doesn’t consider an official “adult film set”, such as website shoots and Clips4Sale type sites” has been added. That is a hole in the system big enough to drive a jumbo jet with the whole state of California sitting on top of it. Theoretically that could mean this person has done scenes for tens of websites such as Brazzers, Kink, Bang Bros, Reality Kings, etc. and Eric’s “assurance” that this person has not been on an official “adult film set” would still be true. I don’t know if it is Leue’s poor choice of words or if an idiot is running VD testing and monitoring over there but IMO this is something you or Kelli should jump on and get to the bottom of. If the latter is true this is very concerning. This is supposed to be a VD testing and monitoring program for an at least theoretically higher risk occupation, not Pepe LePew’s VD testing, Slurpee supply, hot dog and pretzel stand, cocaine supplier, handcuff supply, gay porn studio and Twinks-R-Us Truvada, Cock Ring and Blow Job emporium. Let’s get it together, Leue, Q and Co and do this right — include medium to large websites (sites other than maybe Clips 4 Sale, Only Fans and the like that cater to individual, low-production clients). Bang Bros, Muffia, Brazzers, Kink, Reality Kings and Intersec/Insex (the last of which I include because I am sure from his past comments Matt Williams would cooperate with PASS on this) are all examples of companies that should be included in talent lists for VD transmission checks . Give me a fucking break with this one, Eric Leue.

By: The truth about the HIV positive person .... well the RUMOR about who it is - Naughty News NetworkNaughty News Network

Sun, 16 Apr 2017 04:59:13 +0000

[…] As I’m sure most of you know by now, there is a hold no all production. This is due to the rumor that a performer has tested positive for HIV. […]