Regarding finding any insurance company that will pay for a twice monthly battery of std tests, good luck with that. It will NEVER happen. The union should be demanding that EMPLOYERS pay for pre employment screening, as is required by law.

http://Www.Entertainmentadultunion.com.

Join free now and help us make a difference! Together we are stronger!

Woohoooo!,!!!

Go Union!!, 😉 ????????????????

I made it, it was proven to me. Nobody here gave a shit, so it really is a closed issue 🙂

My first point is this is an abusive hit piece and will not help anyone; that is one that I will stand by. Nothing good is coming from it other than people will give up and it will be left to the ashes.

And for the other point…

I just hoped this forum would not resort to schoolyard name calling when people don’t like one another’s opinion. Calling each other stupid and not getting sex and all that is just something I find unfortunate for what Mike has created here. It does a great disservice to what is a really good blog.

I said what I had to say..moving on.

@joeschmoe

Do tell….what was your point? Perhaps if you ask Mike South he will give you author posting access to shout it from above the line.

Ah, look at the warrior rallying around the cause. I made my point. The two people I am calling out can not accept a different opinion without throwing insults at the person. That is their thing and we know it. Sabrina has an aggressive agenda that is not going to help or better this union or performers at large.

I stand by those statements and will move onto a new discussion.

You may very well continue to attack me for disagreeing with you (and likely will). I will say Lurking, your attack is not as creative as the others, you should get some lessons from them.

Have fun!

@joeschmoe

BTW “discourse”
Noun…written or spoken communication or debate
Verb…written or spoken communication or debate

are you looking in the mirror and posting here trying to convince us that the guy who admittedly wasn’t interested in debating or discussing the topics raised and preferred to hurl insults, accusations and innuendos at the author?

Click to Edit –

@joeschmoe

Unless you’ve had interactions with Sabrina off this forum we can add that to the list of bullshit accusations you were more interested in posting than any debate or discussion about relevant IEAU issues and topics raised.

Here’s something you said that bears repeating since I couldn’t think of a better way to describe your comments throughout this post…”I am calling you out for throwing out insults at people who disagree with you and pointing out you can not handle intelligent discussion or debate without throwing out that kind of nonsense. Again, you are just trying to bury opposing views by irrelevant insults and false narratives”

PS – Ivy.

not bad to play the gender sympathy card (he is attacking me because I am female)…. most of the people here are men so this will likely garner you support and turn more people onto attacking me until I move onto something else.

Gender sympathy (even fake ones like this) often work. So, not a bad play if your goal is to marginalize opposing views.

Unfortunately, your gender never came into play ( don’t know if you are male or female, I can’t see who is on the other end of the computer), you are just making it up to garner sympathy. Hey, it works, so I don’t begrudge you for throwing it out there. You got LurkingReader to bite so far.

You can not “work” with anyone who will shut down any opposing views, who is unwilling to develop their views and listen to other ideas, or calls people silly names if they don’t get their way. So, there is no “working with Sabrina” on this issue unless you 100% agree with her; and that is why I feel this is not a beneficial discussion .

Thanks for proving my point Ivy….. Thank you very much.

He doesn’t agree with me so he is a “butthurt trick” (i am not sure what prostitution has to do with this particular discussion or my reasons for shining a light on you, I guess it is a convenient insult for you).

PS – I am not attacking you because your username implies you are a female. I am calling you out for throwing out insults at people who disagree with you and pointing out you can not handle intelligent discussion or debate without throwing out that kind of nonsense. Again, you are just trying to bury opposing views by irrelevant insults and false narratives. Or rallying the blog by saying I need to save face or something? I disagree with Ivy so therefore I must save face by agreeing? Awesome! I hope for your sake everyone here buys what you are selling so you can feel cool.

And if the group of people on this blog feel your way of “discussion” is awesome.. great… you all belong to one another. I find it narrow minded, and a disgrace to people who value legitimate discussion.

I await your next fake insult because you certainly won’t have an intelligent rebuttal.