thanks Toby,,,but it is far from a stretch, This is the everyday reality, and the number of partners in my little story could easily be higher.

blow job from a porn escort $100
Vaginal sex from the escort $300
ANal sex from the escort $500

Testing negative at the clinic the next week,,,Priceless(but not likely)

Jilted, that is priceless. Probably a bit of a stretch, but far closer to reality than what FSC and most large producers want to believe.

If PERFORMERS were remotely intested in their own health and safety they would demand this of themselves and their partners.

In this study,,30 of the 47 people who tested positive had worked with in the last 30 days,,,of course they NEVER transmitted their diseases to anyone on set.LOL

47 out of 168 tested positive, and a large majority tested positive in more than one anatomical site.

@jilted

Amazing how silent folks can be when they get what they wanted…proof the industry has refused to create and implement an “industry appropriate” method of measuring, and preventing occupational risk.

If the FSC were evenly remotely interested in performer safety they would have contracted for anatomical swabbing to go with urine and blood testing with test frequency based on realistic transmission rates.

@d0125,
Now that youve seen the link to the peer reviewed study I was just wondering if you had any comment on it? Especially on the astronomicly high number of anal and throat infections, which of course the industry does not test for.

Lol read kernes analysis…give him credit for stopping short of hazmat suits.

This bill is no longer severable…which means they can’t knock out the condoms but keep other stuff.

It is no longer discriminating against porn because it requires labor agency to identify and create plans for high risk (and other) industries.

No more excuse that the employer can’t test for HIV…this bill would not only make it legal but required.

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1576

That’s the bill as amended last week.

I have posted that link over and over and over….search it

“ucla 2011 gonorreah study” google search just popped up lots of references. You can also try “UCLA 2011” at CDC. Not sure if the study mike is referencing was started, completed or reported in 2011 though.

http://www.aidshealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/OLQ201418_1.pdf

take special note of a few things
1. One major part of the study is to show how many stds are routinely missed because the industry only does a urine sample test
2, Note how many participants had worked in the industry in the past 30 days,,,and how many of the had oral, anal, or infections in both of these anatomical sites,,,which would not be detected using the current testing in the adult industry.

During the measure b campaign the No on b, James Lee mistakenly referred to this as an old study that was previously published, of course he was wrong about that.

This was done at West Oaks Urgent care,,,a facilty OFTEN used by performers to ‘go around” the industry testing system