What is your point? Do you want to create a site where only people you approve of can comment. Go ahead. Until then what is your point. You have no obligation to read or respond to my comments. I am allowed to comment though. You spending money or telling someone they have a disease has no bearing on my agreement with your opinions. There isn’t even evidence to say that any of your claims are true. But, even believing they are doesn’t change much.

My “actual knowledge” comes from years of working in the industry, meeting and dealing with hundreds, if not a thousand or more performers, agents, producers, and owners. Assisting companies by writing their IIPP and OSHA compliance manuals, along with helping create the protocols for the original industry testing clinic. And paying for, out of my own pocket, over $30,000.oo total for testing, treatment, and bus tickets home for performers.

Erik, where does your ‘actual knowledge’ come from?
Hey Erik, have you ever sat in a room with a 22 year old girl and told her she tested positive for HIV? Try it sometime, and then talk to me about “actual knowledge.”

And your actual knowledge on these issues will never come close to mine, Mikes, or anyone else here.

Flimsy as in not convincing me of any notable trouble or “criminal wrong-doing”. That’s what I meant by that. As in he places some connections from person to person to company, but nothing terrible took place that we know of.

Who’s crying foul? You are the one saying I’m trying to limit free speech. Talk about crying. This is a comment section. Maybe if I posted “First” you’d have an argument. Just making comments you find too inane or just dissenting is not my issue. My comments don’t have to make you agree in ANY way shape or form. Don’t act like my comments have to follow some “comment rule book” you invented.

I questioned no right to do anything. That’s a flat lie. I questioned the validity off all these claims. Never questioned the right to make the claims. Those are very different. By your logic. Your comment is questioning my Free Speech because you said my comment sucked. That’s not what questioning free speech means. Please quote, meaning in quotes show where I “questioned someones free speech”. And I didn’t say there was a prosecutorial threat. Almost the opposite. I was saying that the claim of law breaking the law was flimsy, not genuine or prosecutorial. Again, saying the post is conspiracy or BS is my free speech, not questioning his. Saying “don’t write this” is limiting his speech. Calling the speech BS after the fact is no way a free speech limitation. You seem to be confused. Agree/Disagreement does not equal Bolstering/Hampering free speech.

What’s flimsy about the post? Is there nothing to support stated links between the public information? What’s weak about standard public data used to verify ownership and the publicly posted data posted by the owner being the same? Do you need a rock to hit your head before you believe someone threw a rock at your head?

You haven’t expressed disagreement with the content of what’s been posted…you are debating the purpose of its posting.

Okay…flimsy…seeing smoke…it seems you not only let a few rocks hit ya but wouldn’t consider keeping a bucket of sand/water near the bonfire either.

Respecting your free speech is exactly why the owner of this site allows you to express your inane characterizations, lets us point out that it isn’t dissent but misdirected attempts to discredit vs refute and then lets you cry foul for being called out on bullshit.

@erik

First comment…ooooh conspiracy…
Second comment…aren’t there agencies to address law breakers
Third…questioning the right of someone using their site to exercise their free speech additionally painting that free speech as some type of prosecutorial threat.

Then spin spin spin to try and whirl yer way out of being called on that shit.

You are a troubled individual. No one is being rude to you. You take that on without any instigation. You’re argument is so logically stupid. You’re saying that I know nothing and my opinions suck. Why are you responding to my comments? It makes no sense. I’m sorry I don’t have your “actual knowledge” a.k.a opinions. I’ll try to become more like an angry idiot and maybe my “actual knowledge” will line up more closely to yours.

Erik,
You havent a clue what this industry is about, On any other adult industry forum your ip adress would be traced, and you would be outed to your school, work, and family for participating on a porn forum. You havent a clue how these people operate, or what theyre capable of.
Much more often than not your opinions are based on a complete lack of actual knowledge of the topics being discussed, sorry, but thats the gods hones truth.
And you couldnt work me up on your best day. Dealing with little douchwipes like yourself just comes with the territory. Having dealt with the adult industry for years has been a good training ground for dealing with little trolls like yourself.

Just to be clear my reference was specifically about claiming criminal conduct might be present. Not about giving a negative opinion.