@jilted
Good to know…FSC also deleted tons of APHSS/PASS stuff from their site. It was fun to jot down a reference one day and hours later it was gone…that’s what started the screen shots 🙂

Better than screenshots is archive.org. On this site you can put in any web address and it will show you the site as it was years ago. I used this when Julie Meadows deleted her interview with Kurt trpetow(or whatever his name is) Yep, once its on the internet its there forever, even if you delete it. AVN also deleted a bunch of stuff from their archives about two years ago, but its all still available at archive.org.

@jilted
Lol adultdvd is where I found the case number to look it up…there was a great thread in 2007 with the employee ruling where more than a few performers shared great stuff. Avn (kernes) ran an In depth play by play of the hearing in the Autumn with the promise that in December when the ruling was expected he would give further legal analysis….guess he’s still digesting the info?

Yep copies and screenshots are a like a bitch in heat ready to bite ya in the ass:)

Of course when this ruling came down the industry press virtually ignored it. I posted about it on Adultdvdtalk.com. and it started a large thread on that site. Michael fatorossi chimed in and basicly agreeed with everything I said. Then LIB chimed in, trying to find out who posted the story on Adultdvd. Then AVn ran one ariticle I think, and never followed up.

To this day AVN has never mentioned that all of AIM’s records were, as the court ruled, ‘willfully and intentionally destroyed” So much for journalistic integrity. Yes, AIM records were destroyed, but lets just say that photocopies are a bitch.

@jilted
The industry shouted from rooftops about that case trying to convince everyone of their position that she wasn’t an employee and didn’t have a case. In 2007 the judge ruled that she was an employee. Kernes promised upcoming ringside advantage article mysteriously never happened.

From the moment they ruled she was an employee all the way through blaming her for personal risks to the appeals to Ca Supreme Court contesting stuff like who is the producer that gets fined for not having Workmans Comp insurance and to this day no one affiliated with FSC has publicly acknowledged the rulings. Their lawyers hint around but avoid any direct reference.

The unnamed performer in this complaint raises the same issues as Cameron with the added twist as an unknown and possibly having no personal relationship with the other performers who tested positive of raising the stakes tremendously.

@rawalex,,,,,BINGO, you hit the bullseye. Anyone remember Brooke Ashley, of course you do, she got HIV supposedly from Marc Wallice in the gangbang. In her workers comp case it was ruled that she was infected on the set,,,,,,but her attorneys NEVER provided any evidence that Wallice, or anybody else on the set was HIV+. No test results, no testimony , nothing, yet she still won. She tested negative before the shoot, and positive after the shoot. The shoot involved activity that placed her at high risk, and they ruled in her favor despite the usual industry protestations that she got if off set. The other side in this case called her a whore, presented evidence that she was reckless in her personal life, and still they lost.

Same with cameron, she was negative before the shoot, and postive after the shoot. Lets just call Cameron the new Brooke Ashley.

My guess is the lawyers are gathering in the masses, just like witches at black masses… you can figure out the rest 🙂

@lacey

Wasn’t little red riding hood afraid of the big bad wolf too? The way some folks tell it I wonder if AHF is sleeping in grannies bed.

@mikestabile

Your defenses are exposing additional vulnerabilities. Until you raised the mysterious four and five it wasn’t even a part of the equation. This “document” carries much more weight to prove at least a fourth performer than any unsubstantiated denial from you or FSC. This indicates that AHF backed up from a foolish pissing match that could only be won by violating medical privacy laws or exposing a patient they sought to protect from realistic retaliation.

Have you considered that no specific shoot has been identified to further protect the performer who exercised their right to medical privacy? Ever hear of whistleblower protection?

All this proves is that there are PERFORMERS out there who are filing OSHA complaints and not just AHF… who to blame? AHF or the performer? Because we all know there has to be someone to blame….