A news report on the website of a major Kenyan TV station claimed that the children of Mtwapa, a coastal tourism town, were being sexually exploited.
Headlined “Over 10,000 children in Mtwapa used in sex tourism”, the April 2018 Citizen TV story attributed the “shocking numbers” to poverty and economic inequality.
Mtwapa lies 18 kilometres northeast of Mombasa, Kenya’s second-largest city. Data from the 2009 census puts its population at about 50,000. The town is popular with holidaymakers, but also often described as a centre of child sex tourism. However the evidence does not back up this reputation.
A trail of claims
Citizen TV’s journalist referred us to a 2018 report by Terre des Hommes Netherlands, a group that campaigns for children’s rights.
“It is estimated that in the coastal town of Mtwapa alone, between 10,000 and 20,000 children are trafficked annually for the purpose of sex tourism,” the organisation’s “rapid assessment report” noted.
The organisation told Africa Check it had erroneously attributed the statistic to a 2015 publication by the African Network for the Prevention and Protection Against Child Abuse and Neglect. But this study, which only focused on Nairobi, didn’t contain the number.
The report is titled “The Extent and Effect of Sex Tourism and Sexual Exploitation of Children on the Kenyan Coast”. It is the most recent report Unicef has published on the subject, Catherine Kimotho, who focuses on child protection at the agency, told Africa Check.
The report claimed that “some ten to fifteen thousand girls living in [the] coastal areas of Malindi, Mombasa, Kilifi and Diani are involved in casual sex work – up to 30% of all 12-18 year olds living in these areas. A further two to three thousand girls and boys are involved in full-time year round commercial activity.”
This adds up to 18,000 children in sex work – but over a much wider area than just Mtwapa, which lies in Kilifi County.
How did Unicef arrive at its estimates?
Unicef’s study had initially intended to survey primary schools in the region, but failed to get official approval, the report said.
It then turned to four other methods to arrive at its estimate:
- Key informant interviews of 230 people, nearly half of them tourists.
- Focus group discussions that included 23 interviews with persons and groups with specialised knowledge of the child sex trade.
- Hourly recording of the number of tourists and children entering and exiting places where sex tourism was known to be common.
- Diaries issued to girls under 18 who admitted to sex with tourists. Although 215 were distributed, only 84 were used in the study because most weren’t returned or were incomplete or falsified.
Respondents and focus group participants were asked to estimate the number of children in the sex industry. The researchers said they then compared these estimates to their own observations before using population data to make a “conservative assessment” of the extent of the trade.
Counting ‘leaves a lot to be desired’
Experts told Africa Check that the methods the study used to estimate the population of child sex workers had significant weaknesses.
“Out of all these methods, the only one that can acceptably give estimates was enumeration,” said Dr Albert Manyuchi, a social scientist at the University of the Witwatersrand. “However, the way it was done leaves a lot to be desired.”
He explained that the Unicef researchers should have followed the counting with focused observations as well as a questionnaire that gathered information on the behaviour of the target population group.
‘Basically guessing’ number of children in sex trade
Andrew Carlson is an associate professor at Metropolitan State University in St Paul, Minnesota. He has worked on development communication for Unicef, and studied sex worker populations in South Africa around the 2010 World Cup.
The estimate of 10,000 children involved in sex work in Mtwapa at any given time was questionable, he said.
“A study like this, that is mostly qualitative in nature, is very good to describe the factors that lead to children being involved in the industry,” Carlson said. “But it wasn’t designed in a way that would yield a strong conclusion about the number of children involved.”
He explained that those interviewed “basically guess[ed] at how many children they know might be involved”.
“It may be that the 10,000 is the true number, but I would be very hesitant to make that claim based on the methodology of the Unicef report.”