FSC backs AB 2601

FSC backs California sex education bill AB 2601

Although California mandates comprehensive sex education for public school pupils, from kindergarten and continuing until 12th grade, significantly — especially in light of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ vocal support for charter schools — current law does not extend that same comprehensive sex ed requirement to charter schools.

Assembly Bill 2601, introduced last February by Assemblymember Shirley N. Weber and co-authored by Assemblymember Lorena S. Gonzalez Fletcher, would add charter schools to the institutions required to provide such education.

Free Speech Coalition has sent the following letter of support for AB 2601 to Assemblymember Weber, and copies of that same letter to the rest of the California legislature:

On behalf of the Free Speech Coalition, we support AB 2601, which sets a foundational baseline for sexual health education in charter schools while maintaining significant flexibility for charters to decide what curriculum they adopt, what specific grades to provide instruction, and other curricular elements.

AB 2601 enhances the California Healthy Youth Act (CHYA) (AB 329, Weber – 2015), which mandates that CA public school students receive comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education at least once in middle school and in high school; instruction must be accessible for students with disabilities and English learners. The research is clear that young people need sexual health education: more than half of CA students are sexually active in the 12th grade; CA’s growing STI rates are highest in young people ages 15-24; nearly 12% and 10% of CA high school students experience sexual dating violence and physical dating violence, respectively.

As California seeks to address sexual harassment and abuse, comprehensive sexual health education—with its focus on healthy relationships, consent, and challenging negative gender stereotypes—is essential for preventing these negative behaviors before they start. A recent study found that sexual health education that addresses gender and power leads to better health outcomes for young people. Comprehensive sexual health education also supports student health in myriad other ways. For example, between 2015, when CHYA was enacted, and 2017, the percentage of sexually active CA students who used birth control increased. LGBT-inclusive education has been shown to have a positive effect on school climate and make LGBT youth feel safer.

Unfortunately, California’s growing charter student population is not receiving the comprehensive sexual health education these youths need to succeed and stay healthy. California now has 1,275 charter schools, which serve 10% of California’s student population. Charter schools educate a diverse and often underserved student population: 59% of students are eligible for free and reduced lunch, and 72% are students of color. Latinos making up more than half of all charter students (51%). African Americans are a larger percentage of the charter school population (8%) than of traditional public schools (5%).

Quality sex education is especially critical for low-income communities and communities of color, which are affected by systemic discrimination, poverty, lack of access to health care, and lifelong health disparities. At a time when federal funding for adolescent sexual and reproductive health is being cut, California needs to do more to ensure that charter school students have the same access to comprehensive sexual health education as all other public school students. A 2017 study found that 85% of San Diego charter schools provided some sexual health education, but many failed to cover essential CHYA topics: only 53% provided instruction on birth control; 35% provided information on sexual orientation; and 29% educated students about talking with parents about sex and relationships.

For all of these reasons the Free Speech Coalition is pleased to support AB 2601.

I never felt more satisfied or optimistic than when I rode the river in my youth.

One Reply to “FSC backs California sex education bill AB 2601”

  1. mharris127

    Sounds like an excellent idea in theory. I know here in Michigan it is completely up to the school district superintendent as to how sex ed is taught if at all. In the school district I live in now there is no sex ed whatsoever in the public school district (granted, the last year’s graduating class was less than 40 and some of the elementary grades have less than 15 students total so the school is quite small). In a nearby larger district sex ed is comprehensive and factual.

Leave a Reply